Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
well , some people might think you are a band-wagon-jumping, subsidy-rent-seeking scrounging, look-at-me-arnt-i-fcnk-saving-the-planet, watermelon turd
but not me.
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work
well , some people might think you are a band-wagon-jumping, subsidy-rent-seeking scrounging, look-at-me-arnt-i-fcnk-saving-the-planet, watermelon turd
but not me.
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell
I read in "Sustainable Energy Without The Hot Air" the other moon that a solar panel laying flat on the ground is only about 10% less efficient than a south facing panel, in the UK. Can anyone confirm this? Note, this is not the same comparison as a panel tracking the sun avoiding 'cosine' losses. I read about a thing called airmass (38 times the 'airmass' along the horizon versus straight up) and how light attenuates and bends through the atmosphere in complex ways and was already to attempt to numerically integrate over the course of a day and year (sun angle is important as is the time at an angle, which goes with the sin of the angle) but decided it wasn't worth it at that point.
Comment