Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I thought the protests weren't pro-piracy (well some clearly are) but the other things the bill would allow... analogous to improper use of the anti-terror laws in the UK?
I thought the protests weren't pro-piracy (well some clearly are) but the other things the bill would allow... analogous to improper use of the anti-terror laws in the UK?
Does anyone here follow this properly?
One mans 'Monday Links' poster is anothers Islamic terrorist.
I thought the protests weren't pro-piracy (well some clearly are) but the other things the bill would allow... analogous to improper use of the anti-terror laws in the UK?
Does anyone here follow this properly?
It's a noble goal with poor implementation.
Critics say that the act would breach the first amendment right to free speech, which if true would set a dangerous precedent for Americans. The danger is that what one person / government sees as free speech is very subjective. If the US passes a law which makes it illegal for anyone to find the sites that they don't want you to see, will the UK follow suit and apply our libel laws to American websites and block them?
We moan that China and some oppressive regimes censor the internet, and then watch as the Americans do the same.
As a clear indicator that the proponents in congress have no idea about what they are actually implementing, Lamarr Smith's website infringes copyright - linky
Best Forum Advisor 2014 Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership
Comment