Originally posted by Jabberwocky
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I've heard it all now!
Collapse
X
-
Which part of "without mixing with them" don't you understand, retard?Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodeal -
-
"modern humans, Homo sapiens, evolved once in Africa and subsequently colonized the rest of the world replacing, without mixing with them, archaic forms such as the Homo neanderthalensis and the Homo erectus,"
So if Nordics and Orientals share a common ancestor who walked out of Africa why have the Africans who remained singularly failed to match that evolution?
Is it because the ones who didn't walk out were somehow less evolved and therefore failed to develop (surely the search for food would have been the driver and therefore consistent across both groups), or is climate the driver, and finding cooler climates somehow triggered a development phaseComment
-
Well I'm sure many labs would be interested in researching you as the missing link.Originally posted by MailmanYou happy in that hole down there sas?
Mailman
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Is it not more to do with the fact that
Originally posted by Gold Dalek"modern humans, Homo sapiens, evolved once in Africa and subsequently colonized the rest of the world replacing, without mixing with them, archaic forms such as the Homo neanderthalensis and the Homo erectus,"
So if Nordics and Orientals share a common ancestor who walked out of Africa why have the Africans who remained singularly failed to match that evolution?
Is it because the ones who didn't walk out were somehow less evolved and therefore failed to develop (surely the search for food would have been the driver and therefore consistent across both groups), or is climate the driver, and finding cooler climates somehow triggered a development phase
you can plan and learn and develop more easily in a settled environment as against spending your time running away from lions, leopards, cheetahs (or their predecessors), which would however give an advantage and probably greater development of running ability.
Leave Africa, develop
Stay in Africa, learn to run fast
Yeah, it works for me....Why not?Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Here is your original post fu*kface - look at the word evolved - having devoured your flesh, and pi*ssed your bones clean, you are only fit for fertiliser.Originally posted by sasguruAre you angling for CUK Village Idiot status? The Neanderthals inhabited Europe (including Scandinavia) and evolved into Homo Sapiens (of which the Norsemen of Scandinavia are a part).Comment
-
It was a light-hearted comment sasguru. Dear oh dear!Originally posted by sasguruAre you angling for CUK Village Idiot status? The Neanderthals inhabited Europe (including Scandinavia) and evolved into Homo Sapiens (of which the Norsemen of Scandinavia are a part). So the scenario you imagine is stupid. However this is on a par with your comments on the other thread regarding the Da Vinci code.
You seem to be joining a group of which Chico and Postman Prat are the founding members.
Comment
-
Fair enough, wrong word, IF you follow the Out of Africa theory. There are also gradualist interpretations. But the whole point is that Wendigo's scenario couldn't come about.Originally posted by JabberwockyHere is your original post fu*kface - look at the word evolved - having devoured your flesh, and pi*ssed your bones clean, you are only fit for fertiliser.
Of course he's backtracked now, his usual tactic.
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Today 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02


Comment