• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

So was the 2nd World War all for nothing?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    We'll soon have to think of a new name for France + Germany. I suggest Frankreich, because most French are ex-Germans anyway given that the Franks, from modern day Germany, occupied most of France at around the same time the Saxons were invading Britain.
    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
      Gentlemen, you are confusing Germany with Nazis. The WWII was fought against the Nazis who just happened to rise in Germany. The Germany of today is a much different place and this constant racial stereotyping is disgraceful.
      Indeed, but I don't confuse the two. In fact I think that if there's one country in Europe that's not going to go down the route of totalitarian rule it's probably Germany.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        Indeed, but I don't confuse the two. In fact I think that if there's one country in Europe that's not going to go down the route of totalitarian rule it's probably Germany.
        Don't bet on it. Germany has a strong nationalistic right wing section the same as any other. With issues in Europe being what they are it wouldn't take much, just like last time. The Germans have learned the lesson from last time, but may fall into it.
        Just saying like.

        where there's chaos, there's cash !

        I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!

        Lowering the tone since 1963

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          This is the standard right winged claim that I used to believe. Unfortunately I don't believe it any more. Oh, and I've had some economic education.

          That's the point, you see, when educated middle class people turn against free markets, we're all in trouble, and that's what is now happening. You won't win them back by calling them stupid.
          You're still ignoring my point that it wasn't the bankers who created Europe's current mess.
          Explained here:

          http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...omic-mess.html
          Hard Brexit now!
          #prayfornodeal

          Comment


            #15
            All is not what it seems

            The Germans didn't want the Euro either. It’s a rouse by the left-wing media to make you believe that they did and most people have fallen for it.

            This was all wanted by the politicians who wanted to align themselves with the strong German economy to give the Eurozone implied financial strength which it didn't have. This was required to maximise sovereign debt ratings and without it there could have been no credit binge and subsequent bust.

            Its hard not to suspect a conspiracy when the consequences where so clear at inception.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by TwoWolves View Post
              The Germans didn't want the Euro either. It’s a rouse by the left-wing media to make you believe that they did and most people have fallen for it.

              This was all wanted by the politicians who wanted to align themselves with the strong German economy to give the Eurozone implied financial strength which it didn't have. This was required to maximise sovereign debt ratings and without it there could have been no credit binge and subsequent bust.

              Its hard not to suspect a conspiracy when the consequences where so clear at inception.
              Ineptness and ignorance are usually more credible explanations than conspiracy IMHO.
              But yes if you're a politican on the Euro gravy train, you'll want it to be bigger rather than smaller.
              Hard Brexit now!
              #prayfornodeal

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                We'll soon have to think of a new name for France + Germany. I suggest Frankreich, because most French are ex-Germans anyway given that the Franks, from modern day Germany, occupied most of France at around the same time the Saxons were invading Britain.
                Charlemagne and all that.

                Rather than Frankreich I propose Allemagne.
                Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by zeitghost
                  Mmmmmmmmm.

                  Let me see if I understand this: the ratings agencies are paid by the organisations they rate.

                  Wot a neat trick.
                  They were for quite some time, yes.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by zeitghost
                    Mmmmmmmmm.

                    Let me see if I understand this: the ratings agencies are paid by the organisations they rate.

                    Wot a neat trick.
                    Yes and their ratings are 'opinion only and should not be used for financial decisions' as they all repeatedly said in court.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
                      Yes and their ratings are 'opinion only and should not be used for financial decisions' as they all repeatedly said in court.
                      And therefore shouldn't really be used in the computer models used by banks for deciding on creditworthiness and reporting on capital requirements according to the Basel accords?
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X