Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What the figures demonstrate is that the ones you posted are wrong because they don't tally with the US govt's, Eurotstat or Wikpedia figures.
They're just bollox.
The trouble is that you're so thick you don't understand.
FFS Can someone else take over cretin watch today?
And explain to this thicko that every single source of data, economic experts and the markets know that Italy's long run real growth rate over the last 20 years has been very poor and less than the EU average, usually bumping along at less than 1% I believe.
From here e.g.
ttp://www.tradingeconomics.com/italy/gdp-growth
"Historically, from 1981 until 2011, Italy's average quarterly GDP Growth was 0.35 percent reaching an historical high of 2.20 percent in December of 1983 and a record low of -3.00 percent in March of 2009"
FFS Can someone else take over cretin watch today?
And explain to this thicko that every single source of data, economic experts and the markets know that Italy's long run real growth rate over the last 20 years has been very poor and less than the EU average, usually bumping along at less than 1% I believe.
From here e.g.
ttp://www.tradingeconomics.com/italy/gdp-growth
"Historically, from 1981 until 2011, Italy's average quarterly GDP Growth was 0.35 percent reaching an historical high of 2.20 percent in December of 1983 and a record low of -3.00 percent in March of 2009"
Italy only needs 1% growth to keep its citizens buying Alfas, Armani suits and smart bicycles, because the population is shrinking; that's good in that standards of living increase, BUT it needs more growth than that because it has debts which were taken on when their workforce was bigger than it is now. It's actually quite impressive to achieve 1% economic growth with a shrinking working population; now they have to translate the same growth in productivity to a working population that remains stable, if necessary by attracting educated immigrants, perhaps from countries with large Italian communities, like Argentina, the USA and Aus.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
...now they have to translate the same growth in productivity to a working population that remains stable, if necessary by attracting educated immigrants, perhaps from countries with large Italian communities, like Argentina, the USA and Aus.
Or, more sensibly, raising the state retirement age.
Otherwise, what happens when those immigrants get old too? The problem is even worse.
Or, more sensibly, raising the state retirement age.
Otherwise, what happens when those immigrants get old too? The problem is even worse.
I'm all in favour of raising the state retirement age, but that's the STATE retirement age for government workers in Italy, most of whom basically aren't productive anyway so it won't really help.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
I'm all in favour of raising the state retirement age, but that's the STATE retirement age for government workers in Italy, most of whom basically aren't productive anyway so it won't really help.
Good point, but I was defining it like we do over here - the age when they can start drawing their state pension, which would apply to private sector workers too.
Good point, but I was defining it like we do over here - the age when they can start drawing their state pension, which would apply to private sector workers too.
Oh OK. Yep, it could help, but again it involves taking on a lot of vested interests; the Northern League won't support it, which makes it difficult for a right wing government to push it through, and the unions would go apetulip, making it impossible for the left to do it. Agreed that it's the right thing to do.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Italy is not experiencing the same financing difficulties as the other countries at the periphery of the euro area. It has therefore escaped the drastic austerity measures that are plunging most of them into recession. However, it is not showing the same buoyancy as the euro area's core economies.
This divergence is nothing new: over the past 20 years, Italy's average annual growth rate was only 1.0%, versus 1.6% for France and 1.7% for Germany. This differential is notably due to Italy's continuous loss of competitiveness compared to its main euro area partners. As a result, its trade balance has been deteriorating since 1997, thus weighing on growth.
The main source of growth should remain domestic demand, which would nevertheless be constrained by the introduction of austerity measures decided on last year and by the stagnation of the unemployment rate. In particular, the expiry of the on-the-job unemployment scheme for many employees should impact employment and wages in 2011. Higher inflation (2.5% in 2011) should also subtract from household purchasing power. Consumption should therefore grow only slightly.
Italy does not face the crisis that the euro area's other peripheral countries suffer from, nor the drastic austerity measures that go with it. However, it also lacks the buoyancy of the area's core. Growth in 2011 (+1.0%) should be slightly lower than the already weak pace recorded in 2010 (+1.2%) and barely improve in 2012 (+1.4%).
Today, the UK economy faces another struggle to recover from the 2008 financial crisis. Presently, the recovery effort has been sluggish. Although global economic prospects appear to be improving, economic forecasts for the UK have been fairly negative. In April 2011, The IMF slashed its 2011 growth forecast for UK’s economy to 1.75 percent, its third downgrade in a year. A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) also ranked UK as the slowest growing economy in the G7, with the exception of Japan.
But the UK, from 1996-2006 was actually just above 2.5%...
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”
"Italy does not face the crisis that the euro area's other peripheral countries suffer from, nor the drastic austerity measures that go with it. However, it also lacks the buoyancy of the area's core. Growth in 2011 (+1.0%) should be slightly lower than the already weak pace recorded in 2010 (+1.2%) and barely improve in 2012 (+1.4%).
"
But it does if its bond yields are close to 7%. Why is it that you Eurolanders cannot make the distinction between "should not" and "is"?
Comment