Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Come on Wales!
Collapse
X
-
-
True.Originally posted by doodab View PostThat's a bugger. They ought to have won that, even after the sending off.Comment
-
They have repeatedly said that the sending off was "unjustified", "unbelievable" etcOriginally posted by d000hg View PostThey clearly said several times it definitely WAS a bad tackle. Just not red.
The tackle was dangerous - without a shred of doubt! I would have said a Yellow should be given without any hesitation.
The ref got a few decisions wrong - but that is to be expected and is normal in the course of a match. The ref did not get that decision wrong ie It was well within descretion to give a red for the clear and unquestionable offence commited.
I think the Red was harsh but not wrong!!
<Edit>
FFS Now they are arguing "intent", giving examples of other "worse" tackles, and "but it was in a semi-final".
The Laws aren't based on intent, what others have done or what match it is.....
I bet if it was a Frog tackle they wouldn't be arguing the same!!Jim is a Jedi! - Dara
Jim is EVIL! - Jenny Eclair
Comment
-
-
As much as it pains me to say, the Red was correct.
2nd half has just put my blood pressure off the scale and Mrs PL has made me brush my teeth again due to foul language.
It's a shame it had to end this way as IMHO Wales were the better side on the pitch. Kicking let us down TBH.
I reckon the others are going to have to up their game for the 6 nations.
Right, I'm off for a little cry somewhere.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostAs much as it pains me to say, the Red was correct.
2nd half has just put my blood pressure off the scale and Mrs PL has made me brush my teeth again due to foul language.
It's a shame it had to end this way as IMHO Wales were the better side on the pitch. Kicking let us down TBH.
I reckon the others are going to have to up their game for the 6 nations.
Right, I'm off for a little cry somewhere.



Jim is a Jedi! - Dara
Jim is EVIL! - Jenny Eclair
Comment
-
He nearly broke the other guys spine on this tackle.Originally posted by Wodewick View PostThey have repeatedly said that the sending off was "unjustified", "unbelievable" etc
The tackle was dangerous - without a shred of doubt! I would have said a Yellow should be given without any hesitation.
The ref got a few decisions wrong - but that is to be expected and is normal in the course of a match. The ref did not get that decision wrong ie It was well within descretion to give a red for the clear and unquestionable offence commited.
I think the Red was harsh but not wrong!!
<Edit>
FFS Now they are arguing "intent", giving examples of other "worse" tackles, and "but it was in a semi-final".
The Laws aren't based on intent, what others have done or what match it is.....
I bet if it was a Frog tackle they wouldn't be arguing the same!!
It's rugby, not World wrestling championships.
A well deserved redComment
-
Bollocks. Red cards are for malicious play. That was a yellow at most and leave it to the citing panel after the game, that's what they're for. Killing such a key match has made a mockery of the whole competetion. The worst team are in the final; go figureOriginally posted by Wodewick View PostThey have repeatedly said that the sending off was "unjustified", "unbelievable" etc
The tackle was dangerous - without a shred of doubt! I would have said a Yellow should be given without any hesitation.
The ref got a few decisions wrong - but that is to be expected and is normal in the course of a match. The ref did not get that decision wrong ie It was well within descretion to give a red for the clear and unquestionable offence commited.
I think the Red was harsh but not wrong!!
<Edit>
FFS Now they are arguing "intent", giving examples of other "worse" tackles, and "but it was in a semi-final".
The Laws aren't based on intent, what others have done or what match it is.....
I bet if it was a Frog tackle they wouldn't be arguing the same!!Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
-
ouchOriginally posted by malvolio View PostBollocks. Red cards are for malicious play. That was a yellow at most and leave it to the citing panel after the game, that's what they're for. Killing such a key match has made a mockery of the whole competetion. The worst team are in the final; go figure
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42



- France
Comment