Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Until England find a captain who can lead, a centre cobination with a brain, and a bunch of players who can remeber the basic skills of the game, whoever is sat ion the manager's chair won't matter a damn. Looking at Johnson's body language towards the end of the game, he was wondering who the bunch of clueless schoolboys in the white shirts were.
England have all the talent they need. They just need to learn to use it
England have that; plenty of skilled players in England; unfortunately they seem to go downhill after three or four games for England. Foden, Armitage, Youngs, Lawes all started well in their first few games only to become turgid and dull after a short while. Hopefully MJ will be gone before he can work his 'magic' on Tuilagi.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Looks like it has not taken the new boy long to grasp the ethos!!!
You can get away with this kind of thing if you're winning, but I think England could learn lessons from the Wales team's approach at this RWC; much more professional.
Mind you, maybe Tuilagi wanted to 'jump ship' and go and play for a better team.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
England have that; plenty of skilled players in England; unfortunately they seem to go downhill after three or four games for England. Foden, Armitage, Youngs, Lawes all started well in their first few games only to become turgid and dull after a short while. Hopefully MJ will be gone before he can work his 'magic' on Tuilagi.
That's not MJ's magic, that the basic arrogance of a team ethos that leads the elite players to think they can win without working for it The players have been exposed badly by this campaign, they need to get back to the training camp: not one of them has anything to celebrate. They not only lost badly, they failed to impress on any level, unlike several of the so-called losing sides. Even Georgia did better and played to he best of their ability.
That's not MJ's magic, that the basic arrogance of a team ethos that leads the elite players to think they can win without working for it The players have been exposed badly by this campaign, they need to get back to the training camp: not one of them has anything to celebrate. They not only lost badly, they failed to impress on any level, unlike several of the so-called losing sides. Even Georgia did better and played to he best of their ability.
It's up to the head coach/manager to select the right players, train them the right way and get the best out of them. MJ has not done that. The 'right' players are not necessarily the most talented or even 'best', but the players who have the basic playing qualities and the mentality to become the best. The manager's job is far from easy, and it's just not so simple as just picking a great ex-player and slotting him in. Woodward was a good man manager, as is McGeechan.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Until England find a captain who can lead, a centre cobination with a brain, and a bunch of players who can remeber the basic skills of the game, whoever is sat ion the manager's chair won't matter a damn. Looking at Johnson's body language towards the end of the game, he was wondering who the bunch of clueless schoolboys in the white shirts were.
England have all the talent they need. They just need to learn to use it
How do you reconcile those two statements?
The players are clueless schoolboys who cannot remember the basic skills of the game
The players are clueless schoolboys who cannot remember the basic skills of the game
England have all the talent they need
There's a special piece of equipment available for reconciling contradictory statements and it can be carried on the shoulder of the user. It's called a chip.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
The players are clueless schoolboys who cannot remember the basic skills of the game
England have all the talent they need
You can very easily have talented players who behave like clueless schoolboys when the game they've rehearsed doesn't go to plan and they don't know how to react as a team. That bit is mainly down to the coaching team, of course, but also to a lack of leadership on the pitch.
There's a special piece of equipment available for reconciling contradictory statements and it can be carried on the shoulder of the user. It's called a chip.
Comment