• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

England V France

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    For you, maybe, for me, no.
    What does it mean to you then Mich? You're not good enough to play for England but the Dutch may have you?

    Comment


      Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
      Have to go with Troll on that Mich.

      A nations pride and all that....
      A nation's pride is all very well, but it doesn't put points on the board. In reality, top level sport is a business just like any other and the sooner people learn to live with that the better; they might then stop blowing all their hard-earned on overpriced season tickets for overblown 'clubs' that are actually companies, and start investing their time and money in their local sportspeople.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        Originally posted by Churchill View Post
        What does it mean to you then Mich? You're not good enough to play for England but the Dutch may have you?
        Yes. The Dutch offered me a chance to play at a level I probably wouldn't otherwise achieve, and I'm grateful for that; grateful to the point that I now put in quite a lot of work to support the Dutch mens and ladies sevens teams.

        When they play in the Olympics in 2016 I'll be cheering like mad, not because of any 'national pride' but because I know the players and have worked in the system that's developing them.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Yes. The Dutch offered me a chance to play at a level I probably wouldn't otherwise achieve, and I'm grateful for that; grateful to the point that I put in quite a lot of work to support the Dutch mens and ladies sevens teams.
          Oh well, rules is rules.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            Talent's sometimes 'homegrown', but real top performances will often be imported anyway; coaches are hired from all over the world, promising sportspeople are sent around the world to train and play with the best in their game, equipment is purchased from around the world, athletic training methods are researched all over the world; all this is about importing sporting improvements and of course gives the richer countries or clubs an advantage over the poorer. That's high level sport; the old fairy tale of a great from just down the road practising every day in his back garden and then taking on the world and winning is exactly that in most sports nowadays; a fairy tale.
            Nowt wrong with Alf Tupper
            How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

            Comment


              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Talent's sometimes 'homegrown', but real top performances will often be imported anyway; coaches are hired from all over the world, promising sportspeople are sent around the world to train and play with the best in their game, equipment is purchased from around the world, athletic training methods are researched all over the world; all this is about importing sporting improvements and of course gives the richer countries or clubs an advantage over the poorer. That's high level sport; the old fairy tale of a great from just down the road practising every day in his back garden and then taking on the world and winning is exactly that in most sports nowadays; a fairy tale.
              Sorry Mich, but it has to be home grown (even if stretched a bit) for international. I could not support a bought in team the same.
              I can just about accept Tuilaga, but could never support, for instance, Zola Bud. There are a number of imports in our team for the Olympics that is making me feel that I do not want to watch it, nor do I care how well we do.

              I will still be supporting the real team GB.
              Just saying like.

              where there's chaos, there's cash !

              I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!

              Lowering the tone since 1963

              Comment


                Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
                Sorry Mich, but it has to be home grown (even if stretched a bit) for international. I could not support a bought in team the same.
                I can just about accept Tuilaga, but could never support, for instance, Zola Bud. There are a number of imports in our team for the Olympics that is making me feel that I do not want to watch it, nor do I care how well we do.

                I will still be supporting the real team GB.
                Your choice. I'll be watching because I want to see the best athletes in the world.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Your choice. I'll be watching because I want to see the best athletes in the world.
                  You can see them compete week in week out at events all over the world. There is extra meaning when it is a true national team event. A nation can get behind their team.

                  It would be a sad loss if a nation could buy its team from anywhere. The poorer nations would never have a hope of winning and would bleed talent (and probably funding) making it even harder to produce world beaters.
                  Just saying like.

                  where there's chaos, there's cash !

                  I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!

                  Lowering the tone since 1963

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Troll View Post
                    But that sort of defeats the concept of National sport though doesn't it? & means the richest countries can just import the talent rather than nurture the home grown
                    The richest countries can also invest in training centres, scholarships and so on to find and nurture their youngsters the best.

                    Although, I think a player should have SOME link other than living there.
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
                      You can see them compete week in week out at events all over the world. There is extra meaning when it is a true national team event. A nation can get behind their team.

                      It would be a sad loss if a nation could buy its team from anywhere. The poorer nations would never have a hope of winning and would bleed talent (and probably funding) making it even harder to produce world beaters.
                      It's already the case. Why don't Samoa beat New Zealand and why don't Georgia or Morocco (or the Basques for that matter) beat France?
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X