Is "911" the United States "Holocaust"?

[NotAllThere]

...On past experience of your knee-jerk reactions how else was one to take your statement?...

Anyway you like. It's a free world.

[Churchill]

Anyway you like. It's a free world.

Unfortunately not.

But please accept my apology.

[AlfredJPruffock]

Why did he not maintain his innocent for next 10 years after 9/11?

He seemed very comfortable with making videos and audio recording calling to attack western targets - what does such incitement to murder gives you in court in this country?

Why didnt the Intelligence Agencies find the elusive prrof of whom exactly was resoinsible and planned the attacks -kmow - for example why not Ayman al-Zawahiri rather than Bin Laden ?

Again no doubt about the criminal intentions of the Al-Qaida Group - as you recall though I did not agree with your backing of this group during the Libya war to oust Gaddaffi as I said back then I would not support Al Quda in any cicrcumstance and frankly was rather astonished and saddened at your stance.

[NotAllThere]

Unfortunately not.

True. It's a reasonable free CUK though.

But please accept my apology.

Ok, now you're messing with my head. You win.

[AtW]

Why didnt the Intelligence Agencies find the elusive prrof of whom exactly was resoinsible and planned the attacks -kmow - for example why not Ayman al-Zawahiri rather than Bin Laden ?

It's a bit hard when all suspects hide in lawless countries.

They might not have done enough to get convicted in court but they sure did enough to get shot or bombed from UAV.

It's not the job of intelligence agencies to find proof for court purposes, often that's impossible since a lot of evidence they might have won't be admissible anyway.

You for example is a useful idiot, which is not a crime (sadly) but if you went to hide somewhere in Afghanistan and published anti-western bulltulip calling for attacks on western targets then you'd get bombed sooner or later without CPS getting conclusive proof of your wrong doing.

[AlfredJPruffock]

It's a bit hard when all suspects hide in lawless countries.

They might not have done enough to get convicted in court but they sure did enough to get shot or bombed from UAV.

It's not the job of intelligence agencies to find proof for court purposes, often that's impossible since a lot of evidence they might have won't be admissible anyway.

You for example is a useful idiot, which is not a crime (sadly) but if you went to hide somewhere in Afghanistan and published anti-western bulltulip calling for attacks on western targets then you'd get bombed sooner or later without CPS getting conclusive proof of your wrong doing.

Unavble to make any convincing points you resorty to chilish insults - dont forget I have been very nuch against Al Queda - unlike some on this site who recently backed them in the Libyan conflict.

The very group whom im your eyes was responsible for 9-11.

Will we never leann ?

[Arturo Bassick]

It's a bit hard when all suspects hide in lawless countries.[snip]

So you do not believe in the rule of law and democracy, the sovereignty of state?
That makes you as bad as them.

[AtW]

So you do not believe in the rule of law and democracy, the sovereignty of state? That makes you as bad as them.

If the state can't or won't deal with aggressors who take refuge in its territory then it accepts full responsibility for their actions.

Alf: I never supported Al Quada in Lybia, but I do support (morally) people who fight for their freedom against dictators.

[Arturo Bassick]

If the state can't or won't deal with aggressors who take refuge in its territory then it accepts full responsibility for their actions.

Alf: I never supported Al Quada in Lybia, but I do support (morally) people who fight for their freedom against dictators.

So you support a military attack on the UK for all those asylum seekers we are protecting who are wanted as terrorists in their own countries?

[AtW]

So you support a military attack on the UK for all those asylum seekers we are protecting who are wanted as terrorists in their own countries?

If all of the following is true:

1) asylum seekers in this country establish training camps

2) proceed to do 9/11 somewhere in the world

3) UK refuse to deal with them or unable to do so because of lack of control (of say Scottish mountains)

Then it would only be natural for the country affected to use all resources available to deliver justice using it's own means.

--

Under UK law Bin Laden (if he was in this country) would have been arrested and most certainly handed to USA.