************************************************** ****************************
The risk of accidents and radioactive leaks from Britain's ageing nuclear bombs and submarines is getting "progressively worse" because of deepening spending cutbacks, according to an internal Ministry of Defence report.
The report, which has been released under the Freedom of Information Act, reveals that the MoD is facing an increasing struggle to maintain the safety of the nation's military nuclear activities as cuts become "yet more painful". There was a "lack of adequate resource to deliver the defence nuclear programmes safely," it says.
Written by the MoD's senior nuclear safety watchdog, the report warns that the number of incidents at nuclear sites is "too high". This poses a "risk to the workforce and public safety and to the environment, in both short and medium term".
It also says that measures meant to overcome prolonged shortages of safety engineers "may be insufficient", and criticises the MoD for failing to allocate funding for the decommissioning and disposal of 17 defunct nuclear submarines now laid up at Devonport in Plymouth and Rosyth in Fife.
The report covers 2010 and was written by Howard Mathers, the chairman of the MoD's defence nuclear environment and safety board.
The defence nuclear programmes are unlikely to be exempt from the pressures caused by the MoD's plan to shed 17,000 military and 25,000 civilian jobs, the report says. The aspiration for a 25% cut in operating costs "is obviously pulling in an opposite direction to the current shortfall in resource".
The study urges nuclear managers "to establish the most robust baselines possible and defend them rigorously." He cautions that the government's decision to extend the life of the existing Trident weapons system to save money "will present safety justification challenges".
The release of the 2010 nuclear safety report follows the release of reports for previous years in January.
"This again shows that the ever continuing reduction in resources is putting the safety of MoD staff and the public at increasing and indeed unacceptable risk," said Fred Dawson, a former senior MoD safety official.
"The MOD has failed to allocate sufficient resources to nuclear safety,"
"The report acknowledges this situation is becoming worse and not better."
The risk of accidents and radioactive leaks from Britain's ageing nuclear bombs and submarines is getting "progressively worse" because of deepening spending cutbacks, according to an internal Ministry of Defence report.
The report, which has been released under the Freedom of Information Act, reveals that the MoD is facing an increasing struggle to maintain the safety of the nation's military nuclear activities as cuts become "yet more painful". There was a "lack of adequate resource to deliver the defence nuclear programmes safely," it says.
Written by the MoD's senior nuclear safety watchdog, the report warns that the number of incidents at nuclear sites is "too high". This poses a "risk to the workforce and public safety and to the environment, in both short and medium term".
It also says that measures meant to overcome prolonged shortages of safety engineers "may be insufficient", and criticises the MoD for failing to allocate funding for the decommissioning and disposal of 17 defunct nuclear submarines now laid up at Devonport in Plymouth and Rosyth in Fife.
The report covers 2010 and was written by Howard Mathers, the chairman of the MoD's defence nuclear environment and safety board.
The defence nuclear programmes are unlikely to be exempt from the pressures caused by the MoD's plan to shed 17,000 military and 25,000 civilian jobs, the report says. The aspiration for a 25% cut in operating costs "is obviously pulling in an opposite direction to the current shortfall in resource".
The study urges nuclear managers "to establish the most robust baselines possible and defend them rigorously." He cautions that the government's decision to extend the life of the existing Trident weapons system to save money "will present safety justification challenges".
The release of the 2010 nuclear safety report follows the release of reports for previous years in January.
"This again shows that the ever continuing reduction in resources is putting the safety of MoD staff and the public at increasing and indeed unacceptable risk," said Fred Dawson, a former senior MoD safety official.
"The MOD has failed to allocate sufficient resources to nuclear safety,"
"The report acknowledges this situation is becoming worse and not better."
Comment