• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK faces Nuclear Danger"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    We could get rid of nukes but just go on pretending we still have them. As a deterrent, almost as good and much cheaper, just need a few photoshop experts.

    Leave a comment:


  • centurian
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    The current nuclear fleet isn't a problem - all the go bang bits are maintained by the septics in Norfolk (Virginia) and the boat reactors get more care than any other bit of kit owned by the queen.
    The bit that actually goes bang is ours - although based upon a similar design to the yankee bits that go bang - It's the bit that carries the bit that goes bang to it's destination that the Yanks service - and there are no radioactive bits in that.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    I wonder if it's possible to buy a sub reactor and have it running in your back garden?

    Imagine the feed in tariff on that bad-boy.

    Leave a comment:


  • wim121
    replied
    Easy solution to the issue. Just sail the subs over to a former soviet country. No one would notice our subs rotting alongside theirs for decades ...

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    I think he's right. The best bet is to let the French and Germans build all the power stations and we just pay them a bit extra to subsidise their own countries at our expense, lest that way come an explosion they cork it instead of us.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    "Water might stop flowing downhill due to cutbacks the goverment is warned"

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    A nuclear safety commission that wants more money for something they oversee. There is a shock.

    In times like this they're not likley to say "nah, we're doing fine. Rolling in it" are they.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    The current nuclear fleet isn't a problem - all the go bang bits are maintained by the septics in Norfolk (Virginia) and the boat reactors get more care than any other bit of kit owned by the queen.

    What is a medium term worry is the decommissioning of old boats, but tbh it's really not anything to worry about unduly.

    I haven't read the report but it's undoubtably a variation of the same report moaning about lack of funds that has been written every year for the last 4-500 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
    Here it is Nuclear safety getting worse in military facilities, says MoD study | World news | The Guardian

    I think the very disturbing aspect of this report ,is that given due to MODs Defence Cutbacks we cannot maintain our current Nuclear Deterent in a safe manner.

    It does not make sense to aim to expand Trident's capabilites as Dr Fox wishes - with the resultant massive speding that would entail -.

    Fo all of our sakes - lets hope some urgent action is taken to avert a calamity.
    Scaremongering sh!te... Sorry AJP but it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    This country faces far more real and imminent danger from those referred to as "useful idiots".

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    That report is bollocks!
    Why do you thnk that ?

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by wobbegong View Post
    Linky?
    Here it is Nuclear safety getting worse in military facilities, says MoD study | World news | The Guardian

    I think the very disturbing aspect of this report ,is that given due to MODs Defence Cutbacks we cannot maintain our current Nuclear Deterent in a safe manner.

    It does not make sense to aim to expand Trident's capabilites as Dr Fox wishes - with the resultant massive speding that would entail -.

    Fo all of our sakes - lets hope some urgent action is taken to avert a calamity.
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 26 August 2011, 12:26.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    It's like having an old box of fireworks in the garage, gathering dust and moss. I think we should let them all off, somewhere over Essex preferably..

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Cutbacks make nuclear bombs and boats unsafe, warns MoD - Channel 4 News

    Leave a comment:


  • wobbegong
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
    The risk of accidents and radioactive leaks from Britain's ageing nuclear bombs and submarines is getting "progressively worse" because of deepening spending cutbacks, according to an internal Ministry of Defence report.

    etc. etc.
    Linky?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X