Originally posted by minestrone
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Tony Blair 'no moral decline' on recent riots.
Collapse
X
-
Most consulting is not actual consulting but a way to legitimise bribes."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
We don't know how many firms he is a "director" off.Originally posted by AtW View PostLet's say he worked for 10 years in Govt with PM like salary of £150k, so that's £1.5 mln over that period and half paid in taxes (assumption here), lots spend on stuff so not much cash should remain for a deposit on such house. Now assuming he gets x3 his current salary then it would mean he should be earning £2.5 mln per year just now.
£8 mln is a pretty large amount for a loan and I think when recently resigned public official makes such purchase then HMRC and police should automatically open investigation to make sure it's all legit."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Tony Blair under pressure to explain if he is avoiding UK taxes - TelegraphOriginally posted by SueEllen View PostWe don't know how many firms he is a "director" off.
Mr Blair has set up a complicated series of firms through which he is paid and his charitable work is funded. The structure has confused accountants and solicitors"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
I am suprised that State security offered to him isn't based on means testing, surely anybody who earns so much dosh on foreign trips done for their private reasons should not be using taxpayer funded security?Originally posted by Paddy View PostComment
-
While HMRC are allowed to do things retrospectively, other laws and regulations changes can't be applied in that fashion.Originally posted by AtW View PostI am suprised that State security offered to him isn't based on means testing, surely anybody who earns so much dosh on foreign trips done for their private reasons should not be using taxpayer funded security?
Also he's entitled.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
-
Everything is possible, especially removal of stuff provided in the future - the Parliament can do anything, so long as there are JD Sports stores around the country rioting won't threaten them.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostWhile HMRC are allowed to do things retrospectively, other laws and regulations changes can't be applied in that fashion.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostWhere he got the money from, £8 mln with all taxes paid means he should have somehow earned £16 mln or something in a period of a few years since wasn't high ranking official?
This country should make all tax returns public information just in like in USA - crowdsource identification of those who pay 3.5% income tax as well in exchange for half the tax recovered after successful investigation.
Well, if you do not like the way the politicians make tons of money in this country you can always f *ck off back to Russia where there is complete transparency and everybody pays taxes honestly and there is no corruption.Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
-
Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostWell, if you do not like the way the politicians make tons of money in this country you can always f *ck off back to Russia where there is complete transparency and everybody pays taxes honestly and there is no corruption.
Well said that man !Comment
-
No, I don't like seeing ex-Minister who was just out last year I believe from state work to suddenly buy £8 mln house, it should raise a lot of questions not just in HMRC but also in MI5, MI6 and especially MI7.Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostWell, if you do not like the way the politicians make tons of money in this country
Labour Party should be asking some hard questions also.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59

Comment