Originally posted by TestMangler
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Financial institutions; FFS, grow a pair
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
My clientco doesn't have a defect tool, refuses to buy one and security policies won't let me use a freeware tool. So I got the secretary to make a spreadsheet.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
[QUOTE=Mich the Tester;1372421]My clientco doesn't have a defect tool, refuses to buy one and security policies won't let me use a freeware tool. So I got the secretary to make a spreadsheet.[/QUOTE]
Is the correct answer.......
Don't be going and doing stuff yourself. You'll give Test Manglers a bad name
When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
cos that was his idea of managing the test workstream - we were heavily undermanned this time, he refused to do any testing cos 'he didn't get his hands dirty' so messed about with a spreadsheet he called his 'factory' for three weeks- it then got critical and he was told to do some testing at which point he admitted he couldn't understand our processes and flounced...Originally posted by TestMangler View PostErm, what was a Test Manager doing setting up a defect spreadsheet anyway ?
That's a test lead/defect manager job.
not even worthy of a tester title imo let alone defect manager / test manager... that he said he was way better than the 'test manager' he replaced....sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice - Asimov (sort of)
there is no art in a factory, not even in an art factory - Mixerman
everyone is stupid some of the time - trad.Comment
-
[QUOTE=TestMangler;1372423]although should take, what, five minutes to set up the sheetOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostMy clientco doesn't have a defect tool, refuses to buy one and security policies won't let me use a freeware tool. So I got the secretary to make a spreadsheet.[/QUOTE]
Is the correct answer.......
Don't be going and doing stuff yourself. You'll give Test Manglers a bad name
sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice - Asimov (sort of)
there is no art in a factory, not even in an art factory - Mixerman
everyone is stupid some of the time - trad.Comment
-
[QUOTE=2BIT;1372443]Longer than it takes to set up Bugtracker or Bugnet.Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
although should take, what, five minutes to set up the sheetAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
[QUOTE=Mich the Tester;1372445]Aint you guys heard of Quality Centre (or Performance Centre or whatever the fck they're calling the latest incarnation) ?Originally posted by 2BIT View Post
Longer than it takes to set up Bugtracker or Bugnet.When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
[QUOTE=TestMangler;1372450]I have. Clientco hasn't.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
Aint you guys heard of Quality Centre (or Performance Centre or whatever the fck they're calling the latest incarnation) ?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
[QUOTE=Mich the Tester;1372452]Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
I have. Clientco hasn't.
Get them introduced to it. That should keep you there a couple of years at least
When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
[QUOTE=TestMangler;1372454]Nope, moving on at the end of the month. Might well be doing something completely different, but can't give details yet.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
Get them introduced to it. That should keep you manically depressed for a couple of years at least
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
[QUOTE=TestMangler;1372450]used quality centre on the second project, it was ok - all about the people running it - i'd get asked about the same defect by three different people to which i'd reply 'its at the status it says on QC, when its status changes ill update QC'Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
Aint you guys heard of Quality Centre (or Performance Centre or whatever the fck they're calling the latest incarnation) ?sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice - Asimov (sort of)
there is no art in a factory, not even in an art factory - Mixerman
everyone is stupid some of the time - trad.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Yesterday 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Comment