• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Down

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Where do BN66 contractors come to on that percentage list?
    2,473,488th
    "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Paddy View Post
      2,473,488th
      Hanging's to good for 'em.
      What happens in General, stays in General.
      You know what they say about assumptions!

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
        Where do BN66 contractors come to on that percentage list?
        Yeah and where the hell is Ken Dodd!!! Fail list.
        'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

        Comment


          #24
          From the judgement: Huitson, R (on the application of) v Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 893 (25 July 2011)

          "Background facts

          11. The claimant is an electrical engineer who is resident in the United Kingdom where he works as a self-employed IT consultant. The end users of his services are based in the UK. The claimant would ordinarily pay UK income tax on the taxable profits of his trade. Following the "IR35" legislation in 2000 he could not have obtained any tax advantage by supplying his services to end users through an intermediary, such as a company. "

          That alone should have been enough to hand down bill for difference between normal UK income tax and whatever was paid (3.5% based on words in this judgement, that's 3 dot 5%, effectively zero).
          Last edited by AtW; 25 July 2011, 12:45.

          Comment


            #25
            Were they actually paying 2% tax ( As AtW cliams) ? How did they think they could win the case ? If they are able to being the CUK server down the number affected could be at least a million.
            Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
              Were they actually paying 2% tax ( As AtW cliams) ?
              3.5% mentioned in new judgement with link above, 2% figure I believe was mentioned by judge in original high court judgement - cba to find link, but you can verify 3.5% figure here: Huitson, R (on the application of) v Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 893 (25 July 2011) (see paragraph 16).

              IANAL but this is a very well written judgement - as I said above it effectively says that if it is ok to pay so little income tax then everybody won't pay it and no sane country can allow that.

              It's crazy really - the income wasn't even derived from services provided to company in foreign country - complete UK tax residency with work done in UK and services provided to UK based entity, ffs - how can even be questions as to what rate of income tax should be paid on such earnings?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                People use this site for serious stuff??
                Who'd have thunk it? Seriously, in General.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  3.5% mentioned in new judgement with link above, 2% figure I believe was mentioned by judge in original high court judgement - cba to find link, but you can verify 3.5% figure here: Huitson, R (on the application of) v Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 893 (25 July 2011) (see paragraph 16).

                  IANAL but this is a very well written judgement - as I said above it effectively says that if it is ok to pay so little income tax then everybody won't pay it and no sane country can allow that.

                  It's crazy really - the income wasn't even derived from services provided to company in foreign country - complete UK tax residency with work done in UK and services provided to UK based entity, ffs - how can even be questions as to what rate of income tax should be paid on such earnings?
                  AtW, how long have you had a car in the UK?

                  Let's say for arguments sake 6 years.

                  Well, we (TPTB) have decided to "clarify" a clause that now means that all ex-Russians who shag squirrells in Birmingham must now pay double.

                  Oh and we're going to make it retrospective so that you owe us 6 years back tax.

                  Pay up now.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
                    UK's top Tax Dodgers.
                    1.George Osborne - 35.3%
                    2.Philip Green/Arcadia - 16.9%
                    3.Barclays - 11%
                    4.Vodafone - 9%
                    5.HM Revenue & Customs - 8%
                    6.Boots - 4.9%
                    7.KPMG - 4.8%
                    8.Google - 4.2%
                    9.SABMiller - 3.7%
                    10.HMV - 2.2%
                    What's that got to do with AtW?

                    Comment


                      #30
                      You pays your money you take a chance.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X