Originally posted by MarillionFan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Down
Collapse
X
-
2,473,488th"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
Hanging's to good for 'em.Originally posted by Paddy View Post2,473,488th
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Yeah and where the hell is Ken Dodd!!! Fail list.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostWhere do BN66 contractors come to on that percentage list?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
From the judgement: Huitson, R (on the application of) v Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 893 (25 July 2011)
"Background facts
11. The claimant is an electrical engineer who is resident in the United Kingdom where he works as a self-employed IT consultant. The end users of his services are based in the UK. The claimant would ordinarily pay UK income tax on the taxable profits of his trade. Following the "IR35" legislation in 2000 he could not have obtained any tax advantage by supplying his services to end users through an intermediary, such as a company. "
That alone should have been enough to hand down bill for difference between normal UK income tax and whatever was paid (3.5% based on words in this judgement, that's 3 dot 5%, effectively zero).Last edited by AtW; 25 July 2011, 12:45.Comment
-
Were they actually paying 2% tax ( As AtW cliams) ? How did they think they could win the case ? If they are able to being the CUK server down the number affected could be at least a million.Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
-
3.5% mentioned in new judgement with link above, 2% figure I believe was mentioned by judge in original high court judgement - cba to find link, but you can verify 3.5% figure here: Huitson, R (on the application of) v Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 893 (25 July 2011) (see paragraph 16).Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostWere they actually paying 2% tax ( As AtW cliams) ?
IANAL but this is a very well written judgement - as I said above it effectively says that if it is ok to pay so little income tax then everybody won't pay it and no sane country can allow that.
It's crazy really - the income wasn't even derived from services provided to company in foreign country - complete UK tax residency with work done in UK and services provided to UK based entity, ffs - how can even be questions as to what rate of income tax should be paid on such earnings?Comment
-
Who'd have thunk it? Seriously, in General.Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostPeople use this site for serious stuff??
Comment
-
AtW, how long have you had a car in the UK?Originally posted by AtW View Post3.5% mentioned in new judgement with link above, 2% figure I believe was mentioned by judge in original high court judgement - cba to find link, but you can verify 3.5% figure here: Huitson, R (on the application of) v Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 893 (25 July 2011) (see paragraph 16).
IANAL but this is a very well written judgement - as I said above it effectively says that if it is ok to pay so little income tax then everybody won't pay it and no sane country can allow that.
It's crazy really - the income wasn't even derived from services provided to company in foreign country - complete UK tax residency with work done in UK and services provided to UK based entity, ffs - how can even be questions as to what rate of income tax should be paid on such earnings?
Let's say for arguments sake 6 years.
Well, we (TPTB) have decided to "clarify" a clause that now means that all ex-Russians who shag squirrells in Birmingham must now pay double.
Oh and we're going to make it retrospective so that you owe us 6 years back tax.
Pay up now.Comment
-
What's that got to do with AtW?Originally posted by Paddy View PostUK's top Tax Dodgers.
1.George Osborne - 35.3%
2.Philip Green/Arcadia - 16.9%
3.Barclays - 11%
4.Vodafone - 9%
5.HM Revenue & Customs - 8%
6.Boots - 4.9%
7.KPMG - 4.8%
8.Google - 4.2%
9.SABMiller - 3.7%
10.HMV - 2.2%Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Today 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Yesterday 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Yesterday 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08

Comment