A massive radiation dose increases your risk of cancer by 10%, smoking increases your risk of lung cancer by 1000%.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
UK nuclear support fades after Japan quake
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostWhat would be the effect of a major accident at a coal fired power station? Would you be able to build houses and schools on the land afterwards?
And hydro-electric means you lose the land straight away.
Fukushima was hit by one of the biggest earthquakes on record, followed by a huge tsunami that devastated cities and killed 20,000 people, which in disaster stakes is as bad as it gets. And what happened? Nobody died, in fact none of the workers and certainly none of the public received any significant amount of radiation other than the two workers who had some minor burns from contaminated water.
Even when the tulipe hits the fan on that scale, nobody is killed or seriously injured. Can any other major industrial processes claim to be that safe? It's crazy that people are more scared of nuclear power after Fukushima; they should be reassured by what happened.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostCouldn't agree more and those designs were >40 years old.
Good to see that the more level-headed posters are all drawing the same pragmatic conclusions. Now if we can just settle the panicky Sun-reading ones down somehow.
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Comment
-
ahem
Coal power plants continually produce more radioactive waste than nuclear plants
Linky
And as we do not live on a fault line the chances of a disaster similar to Japan are pretty much 0
So yes nuclear is the way to go - ask the FrenchComment
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostSo yes nuclear is the way to go - ask the French
And if their nukes blow, we'd get fallout anyway, with a favourable north westerly.Comment
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostAnd hydro-electric means you lose the land straight away.
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostEven when the tulipe hits the fan on that scale, nobody is killed or seriously injured.
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostCan any other major industrial processes claim to be that safe?"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostWe've ran out of space we now need to build houses way up in the mountains?
Turns out Tsunami was not the only force of nature I was thinking of; what about man? What if a terrorist targeted a reactor with an explosive? Contamination could spread over a wide area. 5 reactors in the south of England, wait for the right wind conditions and London is a ghost town.
If it's made by man it is fallible. I don't know of any other MIP where the outcome can be so devastating.Comment
-
Originally posted by Cliphead View PostYou really don't have a clue do you?
I perform quantitive risk assessments for a living."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostI perform quantitive risk assessments for a living.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment