• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

UK nuclear support fades after Japan quake

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    A massive radiation dose increases your risk of cancer by 10%, smoking increases your risk of lung cancer by 1000%.
    I'm alright Jack

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      What would be the effect of a major accident at a coal fired power station? Would you be able to build houses and schools on the land afterwards?

      And hydro-electric means you lose the land straight away.

      Fukushima was hit by one of the biggest earthquakes on record, followed by a huge tsunami that devastated cities and killed 20,000 people, which in disaster stakes is as bad as it gets. And what happened? Nobody died, in fact none of the workers and certainly none of the public received any significant amount of radiation other than the two workers who had some minor burns from contaminated water.

      Even when the tulipe hits the fan on that scale, nobody is killed or seriously injured. Can any other major industrial processes claim to be that safe? It's crazy that people are more scared of nuclear power after Fukushima; they should be reassured by what happened.
      Couldn't agree more and those designs were >40 years old.
      Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
      Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
        Couldn't agree more and those designs were >40 years old.
        WFBS

        Good to see that the more level-headed posters are all drawing the same pragmatic conclusions. Now if we can just settle the panicky Sun-reading ones down somehow.

        “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
          A massive radiation dose increases your risk of cancer by 10%, smoking increases your risk of lung cancer by 1000%.
          Is that supposed to be tongue in cheek?
          Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

          Comment


            #15
            ahem

            Coal power plants continually produce more radioactive waste than nuclear plants

            Linky

            And as we do not live on a fault line the chances of a disaster similar to Japan are pretty much 0

            So yes nuclear is the way to go - ask the French

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by original PM View Post
              So yes nuclear is the way to go - ask the French
              Est-nucléaire du chemin à parcourir singe fromage?

              And if their nukes blow, we'd get fallout anyway, with a favourable north westerly.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                And hydro-electric means you lose the land straight away.
                We've ran out of space we now need to build houses way up in the mountains?

                Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                Even when the tulipe hits the fan on that scale, nobody is killed or seriously injured.
                Turns out Tsunami was not the only force of nature I was thinking of; what about man? What if a terrorist targeted a reactor with an explosive? Contamination could spread over a wide area. 5 reactors in the south of England, wait for the right wind conditions and London is a ghost town.

                Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                Can any other major industrial processes claim to be that safe?
                If it's made by man it is fallible. I don't know of any other MIP where the outcome can be so devastating.
                "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
                  We've ran out of space we now need to build houses way up in the mountains?



                  Turns out Tsunami was not the only force of nature I was thinking of; what about man? What if a terrorist targeted a reactor with an explosive? Contamination could spread over a wide area. 5 reactors in the south of England, wait for the right wind conditions and London is a ghost town.



                  If it's made by man it is fallible. I don't know of any other MIP where the outcome can be so devastating.
                  You really don't have a clue do you?
                  Me, me, me...

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
                    You really don't have a clue do you?

                    I perform quantitive risk assessments for a living.
                    "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
                      I perform quantitive risk assessments for a living.
                      God help yer clients
                      Me, me, me...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X