Originally posted by scooterscot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Air France Crash - shocking
Collapse
X
-
Not a pleasant experience. Windshear forces in storm cloud have been known to break aircraft apart, four engined airliners. There's a reason planes avoid thunderstorms and have weather radar to detect them. -
Mmm. Interesting twist on statistics. So when people say "air travel is the safest", it's often down to distance - and because planes travel so much further, they are deemed "safer".
If I'm interested in whether I am going to have an accident using one form or another, surely it would be down to the likelihood of an accident occurring on a journey overall - and for that, air travel is one of the worst.It is worth noting that the air industry's insurers base their calculations on the number of deaths per passenger-journey statistic while the industry itself generally uses the number of deaths per passenger-kilometre statistic in press releasesComment
-
No (and until I'd taken a look at that table, I was sceptical of the air travel is safest claim, because I didn't know the passenger-deaths-per-mile figure).Originally posted by centurian View PostMmm. Interesting twist on statistics. So when people say "air travel is the safest", it's often down to distance - and because planes travel so much further, they are deemed "safer".
If I'm interested in whether I am going to have an accident using one form or another, surely it would be down to the likelihood of an accident occurring on a journey overall - and for that, air travel is one of the worst.
If you were going to go to India from the UK (say), apart from the impracticality, the sum of deaths-per-journey by other means (assuming several legs by car/train/bus/etc.) would exceed that of a single flight.
If you went by motorbike alone, you'd be dead by the time you got to Turkey.Comment
-
I saw a documentary on windshear, and the best policy is definitely avoidance.Originally posted by Cliphead View PostNot a pleasant experience. Windshear forces in storm cloud have been known to break aircraft apart, four engined airliners. There's a reason planes avoid thunderstorms and have weather radar to detect them.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
what a lovely day
Sitting in the beer garden enjoying a mass of helles and the paper, grand prix commentary on the phone and sunglasses on.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
I am petrified with flying, takes a lot of lorazemaps to get me on a flight.
The FOS on plane parts is the lowest of any certified mechanised device where human life is a factor, down to 1.2 in some components.Comment
-
Is this similar to Mean Time Between Failures?Originally posted by minestrone View PostI am petrified with flying, takes a lot of lorazemaps to get me on a flight.
The FOS on plane parts is the lowest of any certified mechanised device where human life is a factor, down to 1.2 in some components.+50 Xeno Geek Points
Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux.Pogle
As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF
Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005
CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012
Comment
-
Factor of safety.Originally posted by Zippy View PostIs this similar to Mean Time Between Failures?While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Lots of interesting speculation here, including that the autopilot took them into deep tulip and dumped them up there without a paddle, plus the warning systems that were remaining gave misleading indications. For example because the aircraft was so deeply stalled and out of a valid operating range (airspeed too slow) that the stall warning turned itself off, and turned back on when the pilots pushed down the nose partly restoring the situation, because the sensors started receiving credible data, then turned off again as the pilot hastily pushed the nose back up. In that scenario they thought they were plunging to the ground nose first rather than tail first. All speculation, but reading through the posts, some from experienced airline pilots, goes to show how complex flying a plane that does everything for you can become when things go wrong.Comment
-
Maybe one of the flyers here can answer this. If you're descending rapidly or in a stall, and given plenty of height, can't you just put one main flap up and the other down, with tail flaps both down, to turn or "fall away to the side", then hopefully sort of turn that into a dive. Then, once you pick up speed, you could hopefully level off back into normal flight.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment