• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

C# 4.0

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by threaded
    Whenever anyone asks my thoughts on C++ I just answer that that Barney Sodastream guy is a Dane from Aarhus. It is enough of an answer I feel.


    C is a programming language, one that "wears well" as K&R put it. C++ adds things that it is really the programmer's job to add. Object orientation and reusability are in the mind of the beholder.

    Humbug!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by cswd
      If you want ASM, use ILASM and you can write code for the CLR. I've written a workflow to native compiler for .Net before believe it or not. Quite simple!
      Always wondered if you could do that.

      Pointers are NOT needed - the CLR dynamically assembles the intermediate language to x86 / x86-64 machine code in the most efficient way based on how it is used. Sometimes pointers make things slower (!).
      Sounds like you have a little too much faith in the optimiser. A custom solution will always be better than a generic one if you're going for out an out performance.

      I was looking into C++ .NET, and it seems they've now fudged the language to use ^ as a managed pointer type.
      Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

      Comment


        #23
        Object orientation and reusability are in the mind of the beholder.
        That's what's so great about it: one can go on site and produce all sorts of evidence that the previous design was cack and has to be re-written to make it reusable...
        Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
        threadeds website, and here's my blog.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by threaded
          That's what's so great about it: one can go on site and produce all sorts of evidence that the previous design was cack and has to be re-written to make it reusable...
          Threaded, you really are a cock.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Churchill
            Threaded, you really are a cock.
            Suggest we have a separate forum dedicated to this topic.

            You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by bogeyman
              Suggest we have a separate forum dedicated to this topic.
              No need, me and AtW are quite happy to share this one thank you.
              Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
              threadeds website, and here's my blog.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by threaded
                That's what's so great about it: one can go on site and produce all sorts of evidence that the previous design was cack and has to be re-written to make it reusable...
                That was what I loved when OO became "hot": do it our way and your code will be reusable. Step 1: throw away all your code.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by expat
                  That was what I loved when OO became "hot": do it our way and your code will be reusable. Step 1: throw away all your code.
                  Yeah, that attitude shows a true understanding of the power that lies within OO. I despair for the clients of the previous two posters.
                  Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                  threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by threaded
                    I despair for the clients of the previous two posters.
                    Yes - me too. I despair all the way to the bank.

                    You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Amazing I post a silly throw-away post about C# and it develops into an all out flame war.

                      Geeks are great aren't they? Call their mothers a whore and they don't bat an eyelid, but diss Java or C++, and feck, they are ready to punch your lights out.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X