• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Cycling training

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Losing a bit of weight would help for the hill climbing.
    I've dropped 7lbs in the last ten days but was not good over the weekend or last night as had a few beers/wine/whisky
    What happens in General, stays in General.
    You know what they say about assumptions!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
      I've dropped 7lbs in the last ten days but was not good over the weekend or last night as had a few beers/wine/whisky
      I can drop 7 lbs in the bog after a good BBQ, so you've got some way to go. keep it up!
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        whs ++, especially on the food bit; just stop eating deep fried food altogether is my advice, and other than that eat a lot, with a lot of variety. I stopped eating deep fried food for a few months several years ago, and when I tried it again I didn't like it anymore. Still don't like it.

        Plus; if you try tabata intervals on the turbo trainer/exercise bike, you'll find that it improves your VO2 max (maximum oxygen uptake) and your heart rate recovery much quicker than constant pace cycling; you still need to do the long slow mileage, but add in two sessions of tabata intervals per week. Google tabata, but basically it amounts to this;

        20 seconds flat out, 10 seconds rest, 20 seconds flat out, 10 seconds rest and so on; repeat 8 times, then rest a few minutes, then do it again. I'm assuming you're already fairly fit here; usual qualifications apply, if you feel sick, dizzy etc, then slow down a bit or stop and rest. you could also built up from 2 sets of 4 tabatas to 2 sets of 8. It's a short, intensive training session that's suprisingly effective.
        As an alternative to Mitch's suggestion you can try this. It's easier to time and keep track of what you've done.

        Start in 1st gear on the middle or small cog on the front. Do 3 mins peddling at a comfortable cadence. Change up a gear, do three minutes at the same pace, change up, repeat untill you get to your top gear but maintain the same cadence the whole time. Afte the last 3 minutes come back down the gears a minute at a time just keeping your legs turning. It's a nice 30 minute work out with built in warm up and recovery. Whenn you feel you can mange it just increase the timing to 4 minutes etc.
        "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DaveB View Post
          As an alternative to Mitch's suggestion you can try this. It's easier to time and keep track of what you've done.

          Start in 1st gear on the middle or small cog on the front. Do 3 mins peddling at a comfortable cadence. Change up a gear, do three minutes at the same pace, change up, repeat untill you get to your top gear but maintain the same cadence the whole time. Afte the last 3 minutes come back down the gears a minute at a time just keeping your legs turning. It's a nice 30 minute work out with built in warm up and recovery. Whenn you feel you can mange it just increase the timing to 4 minutes etc.
          Yep, good as well. key to all these ideas is that you're not just going at a constant pace, but making your heart and lungs pump faster and slower, faster and slower; it's a bit like weight training for your cardio-respiratory system.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
            I've dropped 7lbs in the last ten days but was not good over the weekend or last night as had a few beers/wine/whisky
            When I had a bike (it got nicked a few months ago) I was surprised at how much more arduous it was to climb a hill when carrying shopping on my back. The shopping bag can't have weighed more than 10kg, which is only about 10% of weight + rider. Effort (work) goes linearly with weight, for both on the level and hill climbing, so doubling your weight doubles the effort, to first order. But I never experimented to see whether it was the weight or the awkwardness of the bag that also contributed heavily. It felt more than 10% harder though. Even carrying a few pounds is noticed.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
              When I had a bike (it got nicked a few months ago) I was surprised at how much more arduous it was to climb a hill when carrying shopping on my back. The shopping bag can't have weighed more than 10kg, which is only about 10% of weight + rider. Effort (work) goes linearly with weight, for both on the level and hill climbing, so doubling your weight doubles the effort, to first order. But I never experimented to see whether it was the weight or the awkwardness of the bag that also contributed heavily. It felt more than 10% harder though. Even carrying a few pounds is noticed.
              I don't know, but think of it this way; sprinters (runners) often pull a weight of about 10% of bodyweight on a sled for about 30 to 40 metres at top speed to train their explosive strength; it doesn't sound like much, but do it 10 times with plenty of rest in between and you'll really feel it the next day.

              Last edited by Mich the Tester; 13 April 2011, 11:24.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                When I had a bike (it got nicked a few months ago) I was surprised at how much more arduous it was to climb a hill when carrying shopping on my back. The shopping bag can't have weighed more than 10kg, which is only about 10% of weight + rider. Effort (work) goes linearly with weight, for both on the level and hill climbing, so doubling your weight doubles the effort, to first order. But I never experimented to see whether it was the weight or the awkwardness of the bag that also contributed heavily. It felt more than 10% harder though. Even carrying a few pounds is noticed.
                Weight only makes a difference when accelerating or climbing a hill. On the flat at a steady pace it doesn't matter.

                At the sort of speed suity is managing at the moment rolling resistance is his biggest problem. If he's lucky it will be aerodynamic drag by the time he's doing it for real.
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by doodab View Post
                  At the sort of speed suity is managing at the moment being overtaken by slugs is his biggest problem. If he's lucky it will be granddads in drag by the time he's doing it for real.
                  ftfy
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by doodab View Post
                    Weight only makes a difference when accelerating or climbing a hill. On the flat at a steady pace it doesn't matter.

                    At the sort of speed suity is managing at the moment rolling resistance is his biggest problem. If he's lucky it will be aerodynamic drag by the time he's doing it for real.
                    No. Rolling friction is directly proportional to weight.

                    Ignoring Aero drag, which as you say will not dominate until above about 14mph, the formula for power in cycling is:

                    g * Mass * Velocity * (Frictional co-eff + hill grade)
                    Last edited by TimberWolf; 13 April 2011, 11:56.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by doodab View Post
                      Weight only makes a difference when accelerating or climbing a hill. On the flat at a steady pace it doesn't matter.

                      At the sort of speed suity is managing at the moment rolling resistance is his biggest problem. If he's lucky it will be aerodynamic drag by the time he's doing it for real.
                      On the flat I can average 15mph. The hills are the problem. This is all on a big heavy mountain bike with big knobbly tyres, at some point I will switch to a road bike.
                      Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X