Originally posted by Incognito
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
One killed in HMS Astute nuclear submarine shooting
Collapse
X
-
I suppose dealing with you it might have went a bit above you head. And would rather you did not imply threats to me by PM and will not take up your invitation to come down to London. -
Oh I had assumed that he just wanted to talk.Originally posted by minestrone View PostI suppose dealing with you it might have went a bit above you head. And would rather you did not imply threats to me by PM and will not take up your invitation to come down to London.
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Threat, what threat? Be careful that's libel. I know you don't quite have the grasp of the law.Originally posted by minestrone View PostI suppose dealing with you it might have went a bit above you head. And would rather you did not imply threats to me by PM and will not take up your invitation to come down to London."I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
-
If the joke was contained in the image then there might be a problem - the image is broken (at least on my machine)Originally posted by minestrone View PostI suppose dealing with you it might have went a bit above you head. And would rather you did not imply threats to me by PM and will not take up your invitation to come down to London.Coffee's for closersComment
-
WHy don't you post what you sent me if it is all above board?Originally posted by Incognito View PostThreat, what threat? Be careful that's libel. I know you don't quite have the grasp of the law.
I will not do it and if you are OK with the content of the post then post it up.
Quite clear what you meant by the post.Comment
-
Beltrami & CoOriginally posted by Incognito View PostThreat, what threat? Be careful that's libel. I know you don't quite have the grasp of the law.
83 Carlton Place
Glasgow
G5 9TD
Contact them.Comment
-
You see, typically mock offended, reading into things where nothing was implied.Originally posted by minestrone View PostWHy don't you post what you sent me if it is all above board?
I will not do it and if you are OK with the content of the post then post it up.
Quite clear what you meant by the post.
It wasn't a threat. You've misconstrued it, are you happy now?"I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
-
So you just pop up after many months of not PMing with a "Get down to london" PM during this thread after threating me and doogie on the board in the last week? Don't be sneaky.Originally posted by Incognito View PostYou see, typically mock offended, reading into things where nothing was implied.
It wasn't a threat. You've misconstrued it, are you happy now?Comment
-
Never threatened you or Doogie, I made that abundantly clear.Originally posted by minestrone View PostSo you just pop up after many months of not PMing with a "Get down to london" PM during this thread after threating me and doogie on the board in the last week? Don't be sneaky."I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
-
Does not like the moderating team agreed...Originally posted by Incognito View PostNever threatened you or Doogie, I made that abundantly clear.
I have a picture in my head of the type of person you are and you don't really fit into the forces stereotype. I will give you fair warning, if we ever meet up at a CUK do, don't insult the memory of any member of the armed forces who's given his life for this country in front of me, because I tell you now, I will <mod>be very annoyed</mod>Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Today 07:13
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Yesterday 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55

Comment