- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "One killed in HMS Astute nuclear submarine shooting"
Collapse
-
THere does come a time when we have question the ability and sanity of the people looking after the nuclear deterrent.
-
An apology. In General!Originally posted by Incognito View PostFine, in that case.
Doogie I apologise, never meant it to come across as a threat, simply what I considered as stepping over the boundary.
Had a word with the Mods about it, they accepted my version.
p.s. Wino, you need to sort out your English dude. I've been on the beers and I'm still managing to string a semi-legible sentence together. What's your excuse?
Oh dear. Cardinal rule No 1. Never apologise.
Leave a comment:
-
Well I have not, in the course of this thread Pmed a poster with an implied threat, threatened legal action over the disclosure of the implied threat, denied threatening a poster in a previous post, admitted to threatening said poster and apologising to the poster you said you never threatened.Originally posted by Incognito View PostFine, in that case.
Doogie I apologise, never meant it to come across as a threat, simply what I considered as stepping over the boundary.
Had a word with the Mods about it, they accepted my version.
p.s. Wino, you need to sort out your English dude. I've been on the beers and I'm still managing to string a semi-legible sentence together. What's your excuse?
You have ticked all the boxes in looking like an arse today.
Leave a comment:
-
Fine, in that case.Originally posted by minestrone View PostDoes not like the moderating team agreed...
Doogie I apologise, never meant it to come across as a threat, simply what I considered as stepping over the boundary.
Had a word with the Mods about it, they accepted my version.
p.s. Wino, you need to sort out your English dude. I've been on the beers and I'm still managing to string a semi-legible sentence together. What's your excuse?
Leave a comment:
-
Does not like the moderating team agreed...Originally posted by Incognito View PostNever threatened you or Doogie, I made that abundantly clear.
I have a picture in my head of the type of person you are and you don't really fit into the forces stereotype. I will give you fair warning, if we ever meet up at a CUK do, don't insult the memory of any member of the armed forces who's given his life for this country in front of me, because I tell you now, I will <mod>be very annoyed</mod>
Leave a comment:
-
Never threatened you or Doogie, I made that abundantly clear.Originally posted by minestrone View PostSo you just pop up after many months of not PMing with a "Get down to london" PM during this thread after threating me and doogie on the board in the last week? Don't be sneaky.
Leave a comment:
-
So you just pop up after many months of not PMing with a "Get down to london" PM during this thread after threating me and doogie on the board in the last week? Don't be sneaky.Originally posted by Incognito View PostYou see, typically mock offended, reading into things where nothing was implied.
It wasn't a threat. You've misconstrued it, are you happy now?
Leave a comment:
-
You see, typically mock offended, reading into things where nothing was implied.Originally posted by minestrone View PostWHy don't you post what you sent me if it is all above board?
I will not do it and if you are OK with the content of the post then post it up.
Quite clear what you meant by the post.
It wasn't a threat. You've misconstrued it, are you happy now?
Leave a comment:
-
Beltrami & CoOriginally posted by Incognito View PostThreat, what threat? Be careful that's libel. I know you don't quite have the grasp of the law.
83 Carlton Place
Glasgow
G5 9TD
Contact them.
Leave a comment:
-
WHy don't you post what you sent me if it is all above board?Originally posted by Incognito View PostThreat, what threat? Be careful that's libel. I know you don't quite have the grasp of the law.
I will not do it and if you are OK with the content of the post then post it up.
Quite clear what you meant by the post.
Leave a comment:
-
If the joke was contained in the image then there might be a problem - the image is broken (at least on my machine)Originally posted by minestrone View PostI suppose dealing with you it might have went a bit above you head. And would rather you did not imply threats to me by PM and will not take up your invitation to come down to London.
Leave a comment:
-
Threat, what threat? Be careful that's libel. I know you don't quite have the grasp of the law.Originally posted by minestrone View PostI suppose dealing with you it might have went a bit above you head. And would rather you did not imply threats to me by PM and will not take up your invitation to come down to London.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh I had assumed that he just wanted to talk.Originally posted by minestrone View PostI suppose dealing with you it might have went a bit above you head. And would rather you did not imply threats to me by PM and will not take up your invitation to come down to London.
Leave a comment:
-
I suppose dealing with you it might have went a bit above you head. And would rather you did not imply threats to me by PM and will not take up your invitation to come down to London.Originally posted by Incognito View PostNope
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Leave a comment: