- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Annoyed!!!
Collapse
X
-
-
No, and I don't intend to see any Gladiators naked at the same time.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Posthave you ever been to Japan ?

If your company is the best place to work in, for a mere £500 p/d, you can advertise here.Comment
-
Hang on, so you jumped ship mid contact (A)for another contract(B).
This contract(B) got canned
Then contract (B) was offered again but at a lower rate?
If that's the case how do you know its not just an agent trying to screw more out of you knowing you'd just left another contract and would be desperate to get another in the current market, so he/she takes a gamble.
Naw maybe that's too far fetched... isn't it?I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this
Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
CUK University Challenge Champions 2012
Comment
-
I've dealt with this agency before and know that they are reasonably reputable, and they were prepared to walk away from the client as a result of the cut. In fact, the agent was surprised that I was prepared to go in at a lower rate.Originally posted by Pogle View PostHang on, so you jumped ship mid contact (A)for another contract(B).
This contract(B) got canned
Then contract (B) was offered again but at a lower rate?
If that's the case how do you know its not just an agent trying to screw more out of you knowing you'd just left another contract and would be desperate to get another in the current market, so he/she takes a gamble.
Naw maybe that's too far fetched... isn't it?
And regarding Contract A, I only had 2 days left on the contract before it came to an end, so my losses was a bit shorter than what it could have been. To top it off, the agent is paying for the 2 days loss of earnings.
The client has a bad reputation for penny pinching (They are employers for a friend of my father). So it was surprising that they were offering £400 p/d to start with. They wanted to go down to £250 a day, but managed to get £300. If I weren't in the position I was in, I would have walked away without any question. (No warchest as a result of the recession and being out of contract for 9 months last year).
I would normally agree with what you have just siad Pogle, but on this occasion, I have some trust for this particular agent.If your company is the best place to work in, for a mere £500 p/d, you can advertise here.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22

Comment