• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The House of Lords...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    I read Newspeak today
    Oh Brother
    Airstrip One had just
    Won the War

    They’d seen his face before,
    Nobody was really sure if he was from the House of Lords.
    If you have done no wrong then you have nothing to fear ...perhaps.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Central-Scrutiniser
      I read Newspeak today
      Oh Brother
      Airstrip One had just
      Won the War

      They’d seen his face before,
      Nobody was really sure if he was from the House of Lords.
      I think you need to get over your Orwell fixation old boy.

      I recommend Franz Kafka - the original and best distopian.

      You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by IR35 Avoider
        I don't want Lords elected by population as a whole - what's the point of creating a house that doesn't differ in character from the commons? The whole point of the Lords is to come at things from a different angle, to do what they think is right without caring about the opinion of anyone outside (government or voters.)
        When Britain really ruled the waves –
        (In good Queen Bess’s time)
        The House of Peers made no pretence
        To intellectual eminence,
        Or scholarship sublime;
        When Wellington thrashed Bonaparte,
        As every child can tell,
        The House of Peers, throughout the war,
        Did nothing in particular,
        And did it very well:
        And while the House of Peers withholds
        Its legislative hand,
        And noble statesmen do not itch
        To interfere with matters which
        They do not understand,
        As bright will shine Great Britain’s rays
        As in King George’s glorious days!

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by expat
          When Britain really ruled the waves –
          (In good Queen Bess’s time)
          The House of Peers made no pretence
          To intellectual eminence,
          Or scholarship sublime;
          When Wellington thrashed Bonaparte,
          As every child can tell,
          The House of Peers, throughout the war,
          Did nothing in particular,
          And did it very well:
          And while the House of Peers withholds
          Its legislative hand,
          And noble statesmen do not itch
          To interfere with matters which
          They do not understand,
          As bright will shine Great Britain’s rays
          As in King George’s glorious days!

          Hear Hear

          You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by wendigo100
            And if any elected politician ever shows signs of independent thought, that they might go against the party line occasionally, how many of their party will elect them?
            In a secret vote that's potentially going to put someone in power for decades, MPs will have an incentive to elect someone whose intellect and integrity they respect, rather than whoever the whips say complies best with the party manifesto for the current parliament.

            Comment


              #26
              I have a problem with the current system whereby someone who donates money to Teflon Tony's latest wheez gets a peerage, and is then able to influence the country. The system stinks. A bit like New Lier really.

              But I don't like the old system either. Alternatives:

              1) The House of Lords is elected by independent committees and includes people who have made a significant contribution to society: charity workers, famous writers, journalists, some businessmen and so on. In other words, the great and the good.

              2) A system is created whereby the House of Lords reflects the voting patterns of the last election rather than the first past the post system. Some form of proportional representation system should be used, and local elections held every 5 to 10 years allow us to select 3 or 4 candidates in our area. The winning candidate gets a seat. But losing candidates are then potentially elected by adding up all national votes, and letting in losers with the highest votes, in order to get a proportional representation. That way we don't have the parties choosing candidates i.e. we vote for candidates and unpopular ones do not get votes. The problem with this system is that we will probably be voting for unknowns who we hardly ever hear about. A bit like European elections then.

              But as I've said, the current corrupt system stinks something rotten and allows New Lier to stuff the H of L with their own cronies.

              Comment


                #27
                Nah, a random selection of personalities by birth is far better. We've got the sh1te that results from election or selection in the commons.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Fungus
                  I have a problem with the current system whereby someone who donates money to Teflon Tony's latest wheez gets a peerage, and is then able to influence the country. The system stinks. A bit like New Lier really.

                  But I don't like the old system either. Alternatives:

                  1) The House of Lords is elected by independent committees and includes people who have made a significant contribution to society: charity workers, famous writers, journalists, some businessmen and so on. In other words, the great and the good.

                  2) A system is created whereby the House of Lords reflects the voting patterns of the last election rather than the first past the post system. Some form of proportional representation system should be used, and local elections held every 5 to 10 years allow us to select 3 or 4 candidates in our area. The winning candidate gets a seat. But losing candidates are then potentially elected by adding up all national votes, and letting in losers with the highest votes, in order to get a proportional representation. That way we don't have the parties choosing candidates i.e. we vote for candidates and unpopular ones do not get votes. The problem with this system is that we will probably be voting for unknowns who we hardly ever hear about. A bit like European elections then.

                  But as I've said, the current corrupt system stinks something rotten and allows New Lier to stuff the H of L with their own cronies.
                  Your missing the point. The thing about people being chosen because of an accident at birth is that they owe that position to nobody, the owe patronage to nobody.

                  All other systems rely on the person in that position owing patrongage somebody else. Even a committee has to be chosen by somebody (rather like Gordon Brown choosing over half the MPC of the so called 'Independent' Bank of England). Can you imagine a committee made up of placemen for Toby Blair

                  For someone who professes to hate the current set up in the HoL TB has created more peers than any other PM. in memory.

                  (He also has the worst voting record of any PM since the start of the 20th century, a level somewhere around 4-5%)

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Burn them.

                    See you, you ****. I'll cut you first...

                    Comment


                      #30
                      It's beheading these days, Mr Crosby. Don't want to upset the muslims.
                      I'm Spartacus.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X