Originally posted by MrMark
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Tsunami in Japan
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Unlikely, but Britain and the Netherlands could be bit by a similar storm surge to the 1953 floods, and despite the improved flood defences it might make a bloody huge mess, especially seeing as the low lying areas (London, Amsterdam, Rotterdam) are so densely populated.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
If I remember high school physics correctly, a tidal wave (back then we were still allowed to say "tidal wave") has a very long wavelength and small amplitude, so you'd barely notice it out at sea. It's only when the depth of the water becomes less than wavelength that it starts to break and turns into a thirty foot high wall of water.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostA tsunami in deep water might only be a foot high. The wave rises rapidly as the water become shallow and approaches land.
So get in a boat and head out to deep ocean water.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
A tidal wave and a tsunami are quite different.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIf I remember high school physics correctly, a tidal wave (back then we were still allowed to say "tidal wave") has a very long wavelength and small amplitude, so you'd barely notice it out at sea. It's only when the depth of the water becomes less than wavelength that it starts to break and turns into a thirty foot high wall of water.
The Severn bore is a tidal wave. The 1953 storm surge was another kind of tidal wave. A tsunami has nothing to do with tides; it's caused by the earth wobbling about in an earthquake.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Yep. Probably nearer to an inch high rather than a foot high, travelling at 500 mph, you'd hardly notice it.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIf I remember high school physics correctly, a tidal wave (back then we were still allowed to say "tidal wave") has a very long wavelength and small amplitude, so you'd barely notice it out at sea. It's only when the depth of the water becomes less than wavelength that it starts to break and turns into a thirty foot high wall of water.Comment
-
we'll know soon enough. it will be heading for wake, midway the aleutians, alaska and hawaii then the west coastOriginally posted by VectraMan View PostIf I remember high school physics correctly, a tidal wave (back then we were still allowed to say "tidal wave") has a very long wavelength and small amplitude, so you'd barely notice it out at sea. It's only when the depth of the water becomes less than wavelength that it starts to break and turns into a thirty foot high wall of water.(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
The Christchurch one was pretty unremarkable, except that it happened so close to the city. Since effects reduce with square (I guess) of distance, you need only a small quake directly on-target, or a thumping massive one to get the same effect from hundreds of miles away.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostWhy was Christchurch so bad? From what they're saying on the news so far it seems buildings haven't been that badly affected by the earthquake, and it's the tsunami that's causing the damage. Surely New Zealand being a fairly wealthy country with earthquakes would have had the same sort of earthquake proof buildings as Japan?
Originally posted by doodab View PostThey probably don't have that many aircraft, and little boats aren't going to have much of a chance. If the highest point on your island is only 5-10m above sea level you're basically fooked aren't you.WHS. Regardless of wave size, it's the breaking water that will swamp your boat. If you can get deep enough that the wave isn't breaking, you just go over the top exactly like when trying to launch your boat off a beach in surf.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostA tsunami in deep water might only be a foot high. The wave rises rapidly as the water become shallow and approaches land.
So get in a boat and head out to deep ocean water.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Live coverage on the beeb; BBC News - Japan tsunami
Just saw a supermarket with goods falling off the shelves, all staff running about in a panic except for three obviously well trained and responsible employees who took it upon themselves to hold the wine shelves up. An exemplary display of decision making under pressure.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Wikipedia has a good photo of the oil refinery fireOriginally posted by d000hg View Post8.8 reported now. But yikes. I only found out because Google.com has it on their homepage as an announcement.
Does it make me a total scumbag I hope they get better footage than of the tsunami a few years back? Part of me simply wants to watch awestruck at HD video of what nature can do.
I also want to see video of buildings surviving a huge quake, to show how impressive the engineering is.
Coffee's for closersComment
-
Interesting article on tsunamis here:
Tsunami
That's about 200m. Just having a look at google earth to see how far I'd have to row if I was Fijian.If you are on a boat or ship and there is time, move your vessel to deeper water (at least 100 fathoms). If it is the case that there is concurrent severe weather, it may safer to leave the boat at the pier and physically move to higher ground.
Edit: If you are lucky, 5-10 miles. If you're unlucky, about 80, based on a few random samples.Last edited by doodab; 11 March 2011, 11:06.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Comment