Originally posted by Pondlife
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Car Insurance ruling re women drivers
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostBecause you wouldn't notice.“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostNonsense. The huge blip in the trademark flatlining mediocrity would stand out like a sore thumb.Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
Life related insurance’s (including pensions) tended to pay out more to men due to shorter life spans, so to make them equal they will pay out the same as women.
Basically any risk evaluation that uses gender is now illegalGrowing old is mandatory
Growing up is optionalComment
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostNonsense. The huge blip in the trademark flatlining mediocrity would stand out like a sore thumb.Comment
-
I think the ruling is fair because in my experience, women often drive on a man’s insurance as a second driver. When the woman has an accident, the man then loses his no claim bonus. On all accidents in involving me, it has been women driver hitting the rear of the car while I was stationary. On three occasions the women drivers just drove off after the accident."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostOn all accidents in involving me, it has been women driver hitting the rear of the car while I was stationary. On three occasions the women drivers just drove off after the accident.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
If they ruled that women and old people should drive a lot faster I'd be all in favour.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Just think of all the brass we can make on bringing the insurance systems inline...
Another thing, can't we tell the ECoJ to go **** themselves?
(respectfully of course)Comment
-
Well I, for one, welcome this legislation. Anything that gets that f**king "Sheilas Wheels" advert of the telly gets my vote.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Today 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Yesterday 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
- Will HMRC’s 9% interest rate bully you into submission? Nov 5 09:10
- Business Account with ANNA Money Nov 1 15:51
Comment