Originally posted by Pondlife
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Car Insurance ruling re women drivers
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostBecause you wouldn't notice.“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostNonsense. The huge blip in the trademark flatlining mediocrity would stand out like a sore thumb.Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
Life related insurance’s (including pensions) tended to pay out more to men due to shorter life spans, so to make them equal they will pay out the same as women.
Basically any risk evaluation that uses gender is now illegalGrowing old is mandatory
Growing up is optionalComment
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostNonsense. The huge blip in the trademark flatlining mediocrity would stand out like a sore thumb.Comment
-
I think the ruling is fair because in my experience, women often drive on a man’s insurance as a second driver. When the woman has an accident, the man then loses his no claim bonus. On all accidents in involving me, it has been women driver hitting the rear of the car while I was stationary. On three occasions the women drivers just drove off after the accident."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostOn all accidents in involving me, it has been women driver hitting the rear of the car while I was stationary. On three occasions the women drivers just drove off after the accident.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
If they ruled that women and old people should drive a lot faster I'd be all in favour.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Just think of all the brass we can make on bringing the insurance systems inline...
Another thing, can't we tell the ECoJ to go **** themselves?
(respectfully of course)Comment
-
Well I, for one, welcome this legislation. Anything that gets that f**king "Sheilas Wheels" advert of the telly gets my vote.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment