Originally posted by thunderlizard
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Letters to a Heretic
Collapse
X
-
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain” -
Originally posted by thunderlizard View Postno, the real question is "should anyone give a sh!t?".
We're only one of many species that have at one time flourished and then died out on this planet.
What comes next...?Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostWhy?
We're only one of many species that have at one time flourished and then died out on this planet.
What comes next...?
the testiclopod
its a sort of one legged bollock that can live on a diet of thin batter and water laced with ammonia
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Originally posted by thunderlizard View PostThat is true. It is high time the lizards had another go.
Comment
-
Interesting opinion though from a member of the IPCC.
(a) Request a copy of the draft report.
(b) Sign an NDA.
(c) That's it.
I could be an IPCC expert reviewer, as could you. It means next to nothing and certainly does not confer IPCC membership. Indeed Khandekar is just another retired and discredited academic. The only bodies who retain him as any kind of 'expert' are oil-funded astroturfing groups.
On the other hand the IPCC Working group on the science had over 700 contributing authors, every last one a practising and published climate scientist. Two years ago the Copenhagen congress consisted of 80 sessions, seminars and workshops each led by a practicing scientist or economist, mostly at Professorial level, and met to consider new evidence that had arisen since the IPCC 2007 report and gave us the message
Recent observations confirm that, given high rates of observed emissions, the worst-case IPCC scenario trajectories (or even worse) are being realised. For many key parameters, the climate system is already moving beyond the patterns of natural variability within which our society and economy have developed and thrived. These parameters include global mean surface temperature, sea-level rise, ocean and ice sheet dynamics, ocean acidification, and extreme climatic events. There is a significant risk that many of the trends will accelerate, leading to an increasing risk of abrupt or irreversible climatic shifts.Last edited by pjclarke; 28 February 2011, 23:59.My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.Comment
-
Originally posted by pjclarke View PostEr, no. To become an IPCC 'expert reviewer' what you have to do is this:-
(a) Request a copy of the draft report.
(b) Sign an NDA.
(c) That's it.
I could be an IPCC expert reviewer, as could you. It means next to nothing and certainly does not confer IPCC membership. Indeed Khandekar is just another retired and discredited academic. The only bodies who retain him as any kind of 'expert' are oil-funded astroturfing groups.
On the other hand the IPCC Working group on the science had over 700 contributing authors, every last one a practising and published climate scientist. Two years ago the Copenhagen congress consisted of 80 sessions, seminars and workshops each led by a practicing scientist or economist, mostly at Professorial level, and met to consider new evidence that had arisen since the IPCC 2007 report and gave us the message
I thought one or two of these guys might know their stuff, but now I've read that devastating, detailed and utterly pursuasive rebuttal in the journal Hindustan Times I am reassured that we have absolutely nothing to be concerned about. What a relief .
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cliphead View PostI keep asking this question, what's the worst that could happen?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostHave you seen Mad Max?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment