• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Attention seeking post

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    What happens in General, stays in General.
    You know what they say about assumptions!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
      The same guys.
      Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
        the best instruction I ever had were so long ago they were on the back of a penny black
        "Lick it, stick it and shove it"?
        My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
          I need a group hug guys.

          I just got a huge kicking for a requirements gap in a spec that I wrote last October. The subsequent deliverable is deemed not fit for purpose and has been dropped from the release.

          I was brought to book and shown the section in the related high level requirements document. Sure enough there it was and it was not in my f-spec.

          So I wanted to know how I missed it. Berating myself I opened the DMS and located the document. Opened it. Read and re-read the section. Then I checked the document revision history. This section was added a month after sign off of the f-spec and the document owner did not warn me.

          I'm not sure what approach to take with ClientCo. I am rightly pissed off.

          Options please? Gun-toting killing spree is already on the list
          Weeeeeeeeeeellllllllllll,

          Given that I've met you, and given that we now know we have the same client co, I would say this isn't unusual and there really is no hope for them. Find a way to get a rate rise out of it and you are good.
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by doodab View Post
            Weeeeeeeeeeellllllllllll,

            Given that I've met you and think that you're a really really top top bloke, and given that we now know we have the same client co, I would say this isn't unusual and there really is no hope for them. Find a way to get a rate rise out of it and you are good.
            Yeah I know. No help for them really. While I sit here and simmer thinking about the hot coals I was dragged over.
            Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

            Comment


              #26
              *Always* check the document history first.
              ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
                Act like, yeah it's OK, I'm so laid back and uber professional I don't mind the constant and soul destroying incompetance that plagues my working life from you tosspots.
                That pretty sums up the last two years of my working life.
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #28
                  Just go back to whoever pointed that out to you and explain why it happened.

                  No harm in doing that. Natural thing is to have a post-mortem on these things to make sure it doesn't happen again. You can even tell them that next time you won't assume to be informed if documents are changed and you'll regularly check the archive in future. Then it sounds like how you personally will make sure this doesn't happen again, without just laying blame. "Oh I was silly enough to assume that I would be informed about changes, so next time I'll double check".
                  Last edited by BlasterBates; 28 January 2011, 05:40.
                  I'm alright Jack

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                    You can even tell them that next time you won't assume to be informed if documents are changed and you'll regularly check the archive in future.
                    Doesn't that risk volunteering to be the scapegoat for future cock-ups?
                    My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post

                      Doesn't that risk volunteering to be the scapegoat for future cock-ups?
                      Yes, and in the client's eyes it would be half way to admitting he should have checked for past cock-ups, in other words a bit _too_ accommodating.
                      Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X