- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You shouldn't, but would you?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostDutch extreme right wing politician;Yup that all sounds pretty extreme right wing stuffThe Party for Freedom (Dutch: Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV) is a Dutch political movement.
With programme items like administrative detention and strong assimilationist stance on the integration of immigrants into Dutch society
Anything else?How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
Yep, one of their MPs called for asylum seekers to be interned in camps with no food supplies. The rest applauded until they realised there were TV cameras present.Originally posted by Troll View PostYup that all sounds pretty extreme right wing stuff
Anything else?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Good NSFW warningOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostMussolini´s granddaughter (also a member of the Italian fascist party)

Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Comment
-
Can't find a reference - is there a linky?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYep, one of their MPs called for asylum seekers to be interned in camps with no food supplies. The rest applauded until they realised there were TV cameras present.
Their policy document states:
- Ethnic registration (p. 11)
- Active repatriation of criminals of foreign citizenship and Dutch nationals originating from the Netherlands Antilles (p. 11)
- Eradicating Islam should be the primary target of Dutch foreign policy (p. 13)
- Restrictions on immigrant labour from new EU member states and Islamic countries (p. 15)
- Removal of resources from anti-climate change programmes, development aid and immigration services (p. 17)
- Abolition of the Senate (p. 19)
- Governmental communication to be exclusively in Dutch or Frisian (p. 35)
- Dutch language proficiency and a 10-year Dutch residency and work experience requirement for welfare assistance (p. 15)
- Constitutional protection of the dominance of the Judeo-Christian and humanistic culture of the Netherlands (p. 35)
- Repeal of anti-smoking legislation in bars (p. 39)
- Investment in more nuclear power plants and clean coal plants to reduce dependency on imported oil and because coal is cheaper (p. 47)
All pretty sensible stuff IMHOHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
Bad enough to start with.Originally posted by Troll View PostCan't find a reference - is there a linky?
Their policy document states:
[LIST][*]Ethnic registration (p. 11)
Listen, of course they're not going to put something like that in their program; fact is, they were caught saying it.
Anyone who knows anything of the history of the Dutch population register knows exactly why every other party objects strongly to ethnic registration of residents.
Now then, we all know you don't happen to like the 6 billion people on earth that don't share your nationality, but some of us do.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Yeah. But.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostBad enough to start with.
Listen, of course they're not going to put something like that in their program; fact is, they were caught saying it.
Anyone who knows anything of the history of the Dutch population register knows exactly why every other party objects strongly to ethnic registration of residents.
Now then, we all know you don't happen to like the 6 billion people on earth that don't share your nationality, but some of us do.
Would you shag him?Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
yeahOriginally posted by MaryPoppins View PostYeah. But.
Would you shoot him?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44


Comment