Originally posted by kandr
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You shouldn't, but would you?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Or perhaps it's her get me out of this place look!Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1! -
Comment
-
Terribly sorry. I will stick with Tommy Lee Jones then. I'd do some filthy stuff to him; which is probably slightly wrong given he's old enough to be my Grandad.Originally posted by wobbegong View Post
May I remind you ladies that the title of this thread is "You shouldn't, but would you?".
Mainstream gorgeousness is not what I'm after here, rather the quirky, the overlooked, the attractive but reprehensible and the downright odd, about which you have a secret hankering.Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
Comment
-
How about a pair of 'throwabouts'?
Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."Comment
-
yeah, why not?Originally posted by DaveB View Post
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
for the more adventurous out there and deaf and blind I give you
Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
They're working class aren't they?Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Postfor the more adventurous out there and deaf and blind I give you
removed: shocking illustration
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
no because they don't work! They are benefit classOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThey're working class aren't they?
Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment