Originally posted by MarillionFan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Gov Spending Review 20.10.2010
Collapse
X
-
Why won't they do summer of discontent instead, surely it's much better to stand in a picket line when it's sunny and warm... -
I think they'll try, but the public of today won't side with the unions for long once they are directly affected the smallest amount.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostIt will be like France.
The unions will whip this one into a winter of discontent to which we haven't seen the likes IMO.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I wonder how many people in the public sector have already seen this coming and put serious effort into finding a new job or getting training for something else. It still surprises me when I see an industry or a large company in reorganisation or decline that many people seem to hang on until the bitter end. Clientco is going to be sacking a few thousand people in the course of the next year; their people have known this for several years and know that they're in an industry where there will be less employment in the future; so why are there still so many here, hanging on until the bitter end and hoping the unions can save them?Originally posted by administrator View PostHow many people actually work in the public sector though? Isn't it something like 6 million?
If they do go the route of strikes then I think the rest of the public will turn, we are all facing hard times so why should they put the rest of us under pressure and disrupt our lives just because they are feeling a bit of (some would say well overdue) pain?
Do people not watch the news or read the papers? I do have some sympathy for people who lose their jobs, but I remember the 1980s when lots of people lost their jobs in loss making state industries; people had carried on working in subsidized industries thinking perhaps they had a job for life, but surely it was obvious it couldn't continue? Isn't that the case now with the public sector all over Europe? This financial crisissy creditty crunchie has been going on for more than 2 years. Besides, it's been well known for several years that most European governments have been running up debts and can't finance a huge public sector AND future pension commitments; couldn't people have seen that this was unsustainable, and get out early and do something else?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
To reply to Mich: most people aren't proactive.
There are plenty on this forum who will blame the govt/Bob/anyone but themselves for their woes.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
I recently left the public sector, so I'm okay.
Meanwhile all the people I know who are still in the public sector expect to be safe.
No dramas.Cats are evil.Comment
-
What is the basis for their expectations?Originally posted by swamp View PostI recently left the public sector, so I'm okay.
Meanwhile all the people I know who are still in the public sector expect to be safe.
No dramas.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Sticking their heads in the sand and say 'La la la'Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWhat is the basis for their expectations?What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
My thoughts exactly. When the writing is on the wall, it's better to act sooner than later.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI wonder how many people in the public sector have already seen this coming and put serious effort into finding a new job or getting training for something else. It still surprises me when I see an industry or a large company in reorganisation or decline that many people seem to hang on until the bitter end. Clientco is going to be sacking a few thousand people in the course of the next year; their people have known this for several years and know that they're in an industry where there will be less employment in the future; so why are there still so many here, hanging on until the bitter end and hoping the unions can save them?
Do people not watch the news or read the papers? I do have some sympathy for people who lose their jobs, but I remember the 1980s when lots of people lost their jobs in loss making state industries; people had carried on working in subsidized industries thinking perhaps they had a job for life, but surely it was obvious it couldn't continue? Isn't that the case now with the public sector all over Europe? This financial crisissy creditty crunchie has been going on for more than 2 years. Besides, it's been well known for several years that most European governments have been running up debts and can't finance a huge public sector AND future pension commitments; couldn't people have seen that this was unsustainable, and get out early and do something else?
Why do they stick around?You won't be alerting anyone to anything with a mouthful of mixed seeds.Comment
-
Thats why I stuck at my previous job, if it wasn't for the redundancy cheque I could have been 'not contracting' much sooner.Originally posted by zeitghostRedundancy payout.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
I used to work in the public sector (a long time ago, left in '94). Wanted to go contracting but hung on for eighteen months for the redundo payout. £32K was not to be sniffed at in '94
When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Today 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Yesterday 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47

Comment