- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Oh dear, who'd be a scouser
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by gingerjedi; 13 October 2010, 21:50.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson -
A Texas court has granted a temporary restraining order stopping the sale of Liverpool Football Club, owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett have claimed.
It comes hours after the American pair saw their challenge against the club's sale thrown out by the High Court.
Hicks and Gillett issued a statement as the Liverpool board met to ratify the sale to New England Sports Ventures.
The American duo described the proposed £300m sale as "an epic swindle" and are seeking more than £1bn in damages.
Hicks claims the injunction prevents Liverpool executing the sale of the club to NESV, with a hearing date of 25 October set.
The legal action in Texas - signed by Judge Jim Jordan of the 160th District Court in Dallas - is "part of a lawsuit filed against Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Martin Broughton, Christian Purslow, Ian Ayre, NESV and Philip Nash" read a statement.
"The lawsuit also seeks temporary and permanent injunctions, and damages totalling approximately $1.6 billion (more than £1 billion)."
Yanks neeeeve-er wa-aalk awayyyyyyyyyyy.Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."Comment
-
This has no bearing on the legality of the sale from a UK point of view, because a Texas court cannot enforce it in the UKOriginally posted by gingerjedi View Post
However, it might mean that the buyers (who are based in the US) would suddenly become liable for the "damages" in the US. This may cause them to pause for thought.Comment
-
and it can damage RBS in the statesOriginally posted by centurian View PostThis has no bearing on the legality of the sale from a UK point of view, because a Texas court cannot enforce it in the UK
However, it might mean that the buyers (who are based in the US) would suddenly become liable for the "damages" in the US. This may cause them to pause for thought.Comment
-
Why don't they sell to that fellow from the far east (is his name Paul Lim?) instead?
Very rich blokes (Chelsea, Man City, Birmingham, Fulham, even Wigan) seem to make better and more stable owners than so-called businesses (Man Utd, Liverpool, West Ham under the Icelanders).
Except Newcastle obviously.Comment
-
The offer from Lim is greater than the Red Soxs one ~ £320m. However there appears to be some agreement in place with NESV.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostWhy don't they sell to that fellow from the far east (is his name Paul Lim?) instead?
Very rich blokes (Chelsea, Man City, Birmingham, Fulham, even Wigan) seem to make better and more stable owners than so-called businesses (Man Utd, Liverpool, West Ham under the Icelanders).
Except Newcastle obviously.
The quickest and simplest solution to this is for RBS to place Kop Holdings into administration tomorrow, take the 9pt hit and they should be free to sell to anyone they wish.Comment
-
Originally posted by FiveTimes View PostThe offer from Lim is greater than the Red Soxs one ~ £320m. However there appears to be some agreement in place with NESV.
The quickest and simplest solution to this is for RBS to place Kop Holdings into administration tomorrow, take the 9pt hit and they should be free to sell to anyone they wish.
-3 points
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
If (or when) that happens I'll be popping out to buy a paper and I'll frame that league table!Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
-3 points
Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."Comment
-
Then you can hang it next to your monitor whilst watching this then Tony??Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostIf (or when) that happens I'll be popping out to buy a paper and I'll frame that league table!
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment