- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What exactly is tax avoidance?
Collapse
X
-
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop -
Of course you're right.Originally posted by cailin maith View PostEvery man is entitled if he can to order his affairs so as that the tax attaching under the appropriate Acts is less than it otherwise would be. If he succeeds in ordering them so as to secure this result, then, however unappreciative the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or his fellow taxpayers may be of his ingenuity, he cannot be compelled to pay an increased tax.
However, I think that most people see tax avoidance as something that OTHER people do, i.e. Joe Bloggs has a TESSA, an ISA, a PEP, buys 200 fags when visiting a non-EU country and gets tax relief on pension contributions. He is not an avoider. No indeed.
His neighbour owns his own company and pays himself small salary, some dividends. But he has no TESSA or ISA. Now he's a robbing barsteward who isn't paying his "fair share" of tax. Despite the fact that he pays employers and employees national insurance on his £12k salary. Despite the fact that he has no children using the state's education resources. No. This man is an immoral thief!Comment
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostAnd neither would anyone else....The reform would mean the end of traditional monthly payslips, because employers would no longer be able to tell workers how much tax they had paid each month.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
So they (ie Clegg, Cameron and the other numpties) would like you to believe. It's perfectly acceptable for them to avoid CGT on 2nd homes etc but anyone trying to keep their hard earned cash is a target. It's bloody outrageous and makes me reallyOriginally posted by Platypus View PostOf course you're right.
However, I think that most people see tax avoidance as something that OTHER people do, i.e. Joe Bloggs has a TESSA, an ISA, a PEP, buys 200 fags when visiting a non-EU country and gets tax relief on pension contributions. He is not an avoider. No indeed.
His neighbour owns his own company and pays himself small salary, some dividends. But he has no TESSA or ISA. Now he's a robbing barsteward who isn't paying his "fair share" of tax. Despite the fact that he pays employers and employees national insurance on his £12k salary. Despite the fact that he has no children using the state's education resources. No. This man is an immoral thief!
Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
The lib dems seem to be saying all kinds of tulip at the moment to stir up public unrest.Originally posted by doodab View PostThis is actually a cunning plan to provoke violent revolution.
I'm currently considering the "burning of Vince Cable" as a response to this:
Vince Cable: Send our school leavers to do apprenticeships in IndiaComment
-
TBH I would probably burn the daily mail instead.Originally posted by CheeseSlice View PostThe lib dems seem to be saying all kinds of tulip at the moment to stir up public unrest.
I'm currently considering the "burning of Vince Cable" as a response to this:
Vince Cable: Send our school leavers to do apprenticeships in India
Lots of young people go travelling to India, and if they can do that and get paid and trained then why not? It would also help them realise how lucky they are to be UK citizens.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Yes, and a trip to New Delhi's Chinese restaurants would help the UK's obese youths lose some weight.Originally posted by doodab View PostTBH I would probably burn the daily mail instead.
Lots of young people go travelling to India, and if they can do that and get paid and trained then why not? It would also help them realise how lucky they are to be UK citizens.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Sadly, that would be a common enough interpretation of the situation, I believe.Originally posted by Platypus View PostOf course you're right.
However, I think that most people see tax avoidance as something that OTHER people do, i.e. Joe Bloggs has a TESSA, an ISA, a PEP, buys 200 fags when visiting a non-EU country and gets tax relief on pension contributions. He is not an avoider. No indeed.
His neighbour owns his own company and pays himself small salary, some dividends. But he has no TESSA or ISA. Now he's a robbing barsteward who isn't paying his "fair share" of tax. Despite the fact that he pays employers and employees national insurance on his £12k salary. Despite the fact that he has no children using the state's education resources. No. This man is an immoral thief!Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Phew! I'm OK then??Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post... as does not buying fags and booze.+50 Xeno Geek Points
Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux.Pogle
As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF
Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005
CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012
Comment
-
Trying to sell taxpayers stuff they already paid for and own (AKA Privatisation)Originally posted by Jog On View PostI haven't done anything illegal - I'm curious as to what counts as 'morally indefensible'Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50


Comment