• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What exactly is tax avoidance?"

Collapse

  • Ruprect
    replied
    IMO this will only take a couple of "avoidance" cases to be thrown out of court before the rhetoric changes. This is a question of law, not ethics. Avoidance is not against the law; it is tax efficiency. That is what accountants are for, and that is what there are laws for. If they want to change that, they can change the law (though that may mean they don't get reelected of course).

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Oh FFS!!!! Just seen this in The Mail.

    I'm so up for a pull!!!! Oh FFS!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    I haven't done anything illegal - I'm curious as to what counts as 'morally indefensible'
    Trying to sell taxpayers stuff they already paid for and own (AKA Privatisation)

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
    ... as does not buying fags and booze.
    Phew! I'm OK then??

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Of course you're right.

    However, I think that most people see tax avoidance as something that OTHER people do, i.e. Joe Bloggs has a TESSA, an ISA, a PEP, buys 200 fags when visiting a non-EU country and gets tax relief on pension contributions. He is not an avoider. No indeed.

    His neighbour owns his own company and pays himself small salary, some dividends. But he has no TESSA or ISA. Now he's a robbing barsteward who isn't paying his "fair share" of tax. Despite the fact that he pays employers and employees national insurance on his £12k salary. Despite the fact that he has no children using the state's education resources. No. This man is an immoral thief!
    Sadly, that would be a common enough interpretation of the situation, I believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    TBH I would probably burn the daily mail instead.

    Lots of young people go travelling to India, and if they can do that and get paid and trained then why not? It would also help them realise how lucky they are to be UK citizens.
    Yes, and a trip to New Delhi's Chinese restaurants would help the UK's obese youths lose some weight.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    The lib dems seem to be saying all kinds of tulip at the moment to stir up public unrest.
    I'm currently considering the "burning of Vince Cable" as a response to this:

    Vince Cable: Send our school leavers to do apprenticeships in India
    TBH I would probably burn the daily mail instead.

    Lots of young people go travelling to India, and if they can do that and get paid and trained then why not? It would also help them realise how lucky they are to be UK citizens.

    Leave a comment:


  • CheeseSlice
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    This is actually a cunning plan to provoke violent revolution.
    The lib dems seem to be saying all kinds of tulip at the moment to stir up public unrest.
    I'm currently considering the "burning of Vince Cable" as a response to this:

    Vince Cable: Send our school leavers to do apprenticeships in India

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Of course you're right.

    However, I think that most people see tax avoidance as something that OTHER people do, i.e. Joe Bloggs has a TESSA, an ISA, a PEP, buys 200 fags when visiting a non-EU country and gets tax relief on pension contributions. He is not an avoider. No indeed.

    His neighbour owns his own company and pays himself small salary, some dividends. But he has no TESSA or ISA. Now he's a robbing barsteward who isn't paying his "fair share" of tax. Despite the fact that he pays employers and employees national insurance on his £12k salary. Despite the fact that he has no children using the state's education resources. No. This man is an immoral thief!
    So they (ie Clegg, Cameron and the other numpties) would like you to believe. It's perfectly acceptable for them to avoid CGT on 2nd homes etc but anyone trying to keep their hard earned cash is a target. It's bloody outrageous and makes me really

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Wait until this gets going.

    All your pay is belong to us.
    The reform would mean the end of traditional monthly payslips, because employers would no longer be able to tell workers how much tax they had paid each month.
    And neither would anyone else....

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Every man is entitled if he can to order his affairs so as that the tax attaching under the appropriate Acts is less than it otherwise would be. If he succeeds in ordering them so as to secure this result, then, however unappreciative the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or his fellow taxpayers may be of his ingenuity, he cannot be compelled to pay an increased tax.
    Of course you're right.

    However, I think that most people see tax avoidance as something that OTHER people do, i.e. Joe Bloggs has a TESSA, an ISA, a PEP, buys 200 fags when visiting a non-EU country and gets tax relief on pension contributions. He is not an avoider. No indeed.

    His neighbour owns his own company and pays himself small salary, some dividends. But he has no TESSA or ISA. Now he's a robbing barsteward who isn't paying his "fair share" of tax. Despite the fact that he pays employers and employees national insurance on his £12k salary. Despite the fact that he has no children using the state's education resources. No. This man is an immoral thief!

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Wait until this gets going.

    All your pay is belong to us.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    This is actually a cunning plan to provoke violent revolution.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    that's called "'pushing the envelope" and is perfectly legal until the Revenue catch you

    HTH
    And what happens then?

    I've read the phrase 'perfectly legal' somewhere else today... who said that this morning -Oh yes I believe it was Clegg himself referring to 'perfectly legal tax loopholes'

    A bit like MPs claiming their expenses on their second home then nominating it as a primary residence to avoid paying tax on it..

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by chef View Post
    obvious guilty bloke looking to see how far he can get away with stuff
    that's called "'pushing the envelope" and is perfectly legal until the Revenue catch you

    HTH

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X