Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Nobody knows whether the tube drivers have any qualifications or not.
Qualifications are not a requirement for the job so they are never asked. The could all have a phd for all we know.
Who said that they didn't have qualifications? I was pointing out that limited qualifications is not a barrier to entry like it is with teaching or nursing. back at you!
Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
page 106 shows revenue of £3.6 bln - page 10 shows 2.25 bln passengers were carried, page 84 says 80% of revenues are ticket sales so that's £2.9 bln or £1.28 revenue per customer.
Conclusion - overpaid Londoners charge honest visitors far more than they pay themselves by using massive discounts
Something wrong with those totals considering cheapest zone 1 ticket is £1.80
But to second part, yes the "visitor" rates are just a total rip off, zone 1 ticket only: Cash, £4.00 Oyster: £1.80
Which is why i tell anyone coming to london even for just a day to buy a card, one return journey you make up the initial outlay
Something wrong with those totals considering cheapest zone 1 ticket is £1.80
I think the total passengers must mean total journeys - i.e. tourist comes to London and buys £5.60 travelcard and makes 10 tube trips in the day = 56p a go.
That would be a waste of time. He would never believe me. He has his own world model and will not let reality intrude.
I only posted it for the benefit of others. Sometimes people get lazy and believe the popular opinion; not everyone knows where to find the facts (as much are they are given the source).
Of course a large part of the increase is because of the reduced tax take, which is due to the recession, which is arguably the fault of the bankers. So although it may not be bailout costs per se, it's still the fault of the spekulants.
While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'
Comment