Sorry, don't have a Link for this but I was relieved to learn that the coalition are not going ahead with the proposed reduction in the drink drive limit. Read it in the Mail earlier in the week. Apparently the minister responsible for whatever department dealt with this was concerned about the impact on rural pubs.
You can bet your bottom dollar that NU Lab would have steam rollered this one through. The thing that gets me is that the proponents of the reduction claim that the change would save 65 lives a year. How on earth do they come up with these figures? Presumably they look at fatal accidents where the person at fault had between 50 and 80 mg of alcohol in their blood. Which ,of course, is completely crass because it negates all other causal factors.
Anyway, in a month in which one of my country locals closed and another became yet another curry house, I have to say I was heartened to hear this news.
You can bet your bottom dollar that NU Lab would have steam rollered this one through. The thing that gets me is that the proponents of the reduction claim that the change would save 65 lives a year. How on earth do they come up with these figures? Presumably they look at fatal accidents where the person at fault had between 50 and 80 mg of alcohol in their blood. Which ,of course, is completely crass because it negates all other causal factors.
Anyway, in a month in which one of my country locals closed and another became yet another curry house, I have to say I was heartened to hear this news.
Comment