Originally posted by OwlHoot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: good to see common sense prevail
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "good to see common sense prevail"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by gricerboy View Post
As somebody who does not indulge in the consumption of alcoholic beverages, I feel I am qualified to take a stand on your wholly irresponsible thread.
I think drinking alcohol is a disgusting habit and it debases the human condition. People who drive with any alcohol in their bloodstream AT ALL are, in my humble opinion, a menace to society.
Vis a vis your post, what about the 65 people who are now going to lose their lives so you can indulge your filthy habit? You say the figures are made up. I say they're not. Let's put some faces to the 65 shall we? It's that little old lady down the street, those 2 brownies you see walk past your window every Tuesday on their way to their pack meeting, the little boy on his spacehopper, the vicar riding past on his sit up and beg cycle and yes - the young chap on the recumbent bicycle.
My conscience is clear. Personally I don't see how you can sleep at night.
If that figure of 65 had any credibility whatever (which it hasn't), it would probably be more than offset by the number of deaths the extra absenteeism would cause.
P.S. I wouldn't lose any sleep if the guy on the recumbent bicycle ended up under a truck.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gricerboy View PostI think drinking alcohol is a disgusting habit and it debases the human condition.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gricerboy View PostAs somebody who does not indulge in the consumption of alcoholic beverages, I am totally unqualified to pass comment on those who do, so I shall refrain from making any comment so as not to appear like an interfering busybody
FTFY
Leave a comment:
-
As somebody who does not indulge in the consumption of alcoholic beverages, I feel I am qualified to take a stand on your wholly irresponsible thread.
I think drinking alcohol is a disgusting habit and it debases the human condition. People who drive with any alcohol in their bloodstream AT ALL are, in my humble opinion, a menace to society.
Vis a vis your post, what about the 65 people who are now going to lose their lives so you can indulge your filthy habit? You say the figures are made up. I say they're not. Let's put some faces to the 65 shall we? It's that little old lady down the street, those 2 brownies you see walk past your window every Tuesday on their way to their pack meeting, the little boy on his spacehopper, the vicar riding past on his sit up and beg cycle and yes - the young chap on the recumbent bicycle.
My conscience is clear. Personally I don't see how you can sleep at night.Last edited by gricerboy; 25 August 2010, 20:31.
Leave a comment:
-
good to see common sense prevail
Sorry, don't have a Link for this but I was relieved to learn that the coalition are not going ahead with the proposed reduction in the drink drive limit. Read it in the Mail earlier in the week. Apparently the minister responsible for whatever department dealt with this was concerned about the impact on rural pubs.
You can bet your bottom dollar that NU Lab would have steam rollered this one through. The thing that gets me is that the proponents of the reduction claim that the change would save 65 lives a year. How on earth do they come up with these figures? Presumably they look at fatal accidents where the person at fault had between 50 and 80 mg of alcohol in their blood. Which ,of course, is completely crass because it negates all other causal factors.
Anyway, in a month in which one of my country locals closed and another became yet another curry house, I have to say I was heartened to hear this news.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Today 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
- Will HMRC’s 9% interest rate bully you into submission? Nov 5 09:10
- Business Account with ANNA Money Nov 1 15:51
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Oct 31 14:11
Leave a comment: