Originally posted by sasguru
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Inventions
Collapse
X
-
Useful in trains where some dickhead is listening to music through earphones. If it could also send an ear splitting, torturous 'beam' of high pitched noise into the said dickhead's ear I would certainly be an interested customer.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Quick, patent it!Originally posted by sasguru View PostA device that neutralises any regular sound. Regular sounds should send out a regular wave. How about a device that senses the timing and magnitude of the air displacement and generates an exact equal and opposite wave to neutralise the original?
Applications would be in airplanes, factories, CUK dos, anywhere there is a regular annoying sound.
(You'll probably have a fight on your hands with Lotus, Bose, Harman Kardan etc.)
Comment
-
Krups 230-70 Egg Express Egg CookerOriginally posted by MaryPoppins View PostYessss. I am tulipe at boiling eggs. Which is pretty embarrassing.
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Already done. Porsche and other top marques already use it in their cars n stuff. It's called Phase Cancellation Active Noise Control..Originally posted by sasguru View PostA device that neutralises any regular sound. Regular sounds should send out a regular wave. How about a device that senses the timing and magnitude of the air displacement and generates an exact equal and opposite wave to neutralise the original?
Applications would be in airplanes, factories, CUK dos, anywhere there is a regular annoying sound.
... but I am betting you already know this and it was the last line that was the key to your post
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
This was my final year project as an undergrad.Originally posted by sasguru View PostA device that neutralises any regular sound. Regular sounds should send out a regular wave. How about a device that senses the timing and magnitude of the air displacement and generates an exact equal and opposite wave to neutralise the original?
Applications would be in airplanes, factories, CUK dos, anywhere there is a regular annoying sound.
GSM noise cancellation for folks with hearing aids. They were irritated and some cases caused pain because of the intermittent bleep we've all become accustom with.
My solution was to build an inverse RF and EM generator equal in amplitude to the incoming radiation. Of course there as lag in the electronics capability to respond so there was a phase variance that was unlikely to be compensated for. In the end I achieved a 70% reduction in interference oh and a degree
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Today 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Yesterday 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02

Comment