-
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested." -
Yep, old news but sickening.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Am not disputing the fact he shouldn't have done it but the wording in the news always leaves something to be desired. It wasn't that he wasn't 'qualified', a word that doesn't actually get used again in the whole article as it happens. He IS qualified to carry out this work, he shouldn't have been eligible or some other word like that.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
Someone has put that word in title even though it has no reference again and is could be (and is) very misleading.
That rant aside, what a stupid **** up when there was so much at stake. Stupidity at work again.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Depends how you look at it; the copper got away with what he did, so the police might say it was all very clever.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
No, it's not clever because police lost out in trust and prestige, that will cost them far more than giving up "one of their own".Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostComment
-
You can´t lose something you don´t have (unless you're a banker).Originally posted by AtW View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Is the thread title a deliberate double-entendre?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Don't worry there will soon be a law against thinking that.Originally posted by AtW View PostMcCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
Comment