Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
This is not true. I started using Google in 2001 - well before they became mainstream.
They got lots of following because of a number of innovations that they had comparing to other search engines:
1) searches were very fast - always
2) relevant results due to anchor hits taken into account (I do it too) and using rank of pages importantce based on links (will add it this month)
3) clean layout - no junk around
They also added two more little thought about innovations:
1) text snippets quickly pre-viewing content of matches on the page
2) max pages per site limit
1) No! Unless searches are very slow, users do not care. Back then most people were using dial up and the bottleneck was the internet connection, not the search engine. Quality first, speed second.
2) I already said that.
3) Yes, but there are not many alternatives are there?
The business model is VERY important. It's what funds them. What's your business model?
BTW I was using Arpanet and Telnet long before the internet became mainstream. An irrelevent comment but I'm following your lead.
The business model is VERY important. It's what funds them. What's your business model?
Software licensing seems rather attractive option - having good show case of it in terms of huge WWW database is the kind of demonstration that will make it sell far easier than otherwise - because I have to scale to far far bigger volumes than ordinary SE writers my stuff will be much more efficient with small volumes measured in millions of products. That's serious competitive advantage.
Comment