• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Fair Tax System

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    That's what VAT is (and the old Sales Tax).

    In NZ and Oz it's called GST, Goods and Services Tax because it's a tax on goods and services. Not too sure why it's called Value Added Tax here, where's the added value (as opposed to the added cost to the consumer)?
    The point I'm making is the "Don't tax income" bit. One or the other but not both.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      The point I'm making is the "Don't tax income" bit. One or the other but not both.
      If successive governments hadn’t wasted the north sea oil, sold off all the gold at the bottom of the market, run deficits for years, but instead had run surpluses by controlling government spending, Britain could now lend money to the USA and the rest of Europe and probably live off the interest without anyone paying any tax.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        If successive governments hadn’t wasted the north sea oil, sold off all the gold at the bottom of the market, run deficits for years, but instead had run surpluses by controlling government spending, Britain could now lend money to the USA and the rest of Europe and probably live off the interest without anyone paying any tax.
        Well, as it happens.......


        Code:
                                                 MAJOR FOREIGN HOLDERS OF TREASURY SECURITIES
                                                             (in billions of dollars)
                                                           HOLDINGS 1/ AT END OF PERIOD
         
         
                                                                                                     New 5/  Old 5/
                                                                                                     Series  Series
                               Mar     Feb     Jan     Dec     Nov     Oct     Sep     Aug     Jul     Jun     Jun     May     Apr     Mar
        Country               2010    2010    2010    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009
                             ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------
        China, Mainland       895.2   877.5   889.0   894.8   929.0   938.3   938.3   936.5   939.9   915.8   776.4   801.5   763.5
        Japan                 784.9   768.5   765.4   765.7   754.3   742.9   747.9   727.5   720.9   708.2   711.2   677.2   685.9
        United Kingdom        279.0   233.5   208.3   180.3   155.5   108.1   126.8   104.3    97.1    90.8   213.5   163.7   152.7
        Oil Exporters         229.5   218.8   218.4   207.4   208.3   209.0   205.9   209.8   209.9   211.8   191.2   192.9   189.6
        Source: US Treasury (Sminki)


        I know, I know, I know that it doesn't quite mean what it says ........
        How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

        Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
        Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

        "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post

          :::

          Source: US Treasury (Sminki)

          I know, I know, I know that it doesn't quite mean what it says ........
          It looks like the UK doing its remora imitation - Hanging on for dear life to the underside of the US shark, for safety and to catch any scraps it can.
          Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Churchill View Post
            The point I'm making is the "Don't tax income" bit. One or the other but not both.
            Sheesh! You looking for some sort of utopia?

            It's easier to tax a little bit of everything rather than a great wodge of only one or two things. More fair, you see, and people don't squeal as much. Sort of like boiling a frog, if you let the water heat up gently he won't jump out.

            If it moves, tax it. If it doesn't move, kick it until it moves and then tax it.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Bunk View Post
              For once I actually agree with you in principle, but I'd go further and extend that to all tax. There's no good reason for it to be complicated, other than keeping accountants in work.


              "Tax doesn't have to be taxing" - yeah right.

              They could start with simple things - why is there separate employers and employees NI? In fact, why is NI separate from income tax at all? and why do we have tax discs? - just add a bit to fuel duty and save £millions in printing and administering discs.
              Back at the coal face

              Comment


                #17
                Could be worse.. you could be in singapore.

                Singaporeans get no rebate for income tax this year

                Why no income tax rebate?

                For those of you who aren't familiar with the singaporean tax system. If the government there makes too much of a surplus then they pay some of the tax back to the citizens.
                Coffee's for closers

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  If successive governments hadn’t wasted the north sea oil, sold off all the gold at the bottom of the market, run deficits for years, but instead had run surpluses by controlling government spending, Britain could now lend money to the USA and the rest of Europe and probably live off the interest without anyone paying any tax.
                  Norway still taxes their population.

                  You can tax your population but don't waste the money gained from the sale of your assets.
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X