I'm in favour of a flat rate right across the board for freelancers; say 20%. No expenses, nothing. Then you'd just fill in a form once a year, pop a cheque in the post and sack your accountant. Save yourself 1.5k per year and countless hours doing tedious paperwork.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Fair Tax System
Collapse
X
-
-
For once I actually agree with you in principle, but I'd go further and extend that to all tax. There's no good reason for it to be complicated, other than keeping accountants in work. -
Any VAT?Originally posted by gricerboy View PostI'm in favour of a flat rate right across the board for freelancers; say 20%. No expenses, nothing. Then you'd just fill in a form once a year, pop a cheque in the post and sack your accountant. Save yourself 1.5k per year and countless hours doing tedious paperwork.
What about any software sales / disbursements?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
That's easy to do yourself thoughOriginally posted by Moscow Mule View PostAny VAT?
What about any software sales / disbursements?Comment
-
Not only do I agree - that was my idea !
IR35 is fine except for the 5% allowance, permie benefits must be worth 30-50%, 20% looks very generous from us and we get to sleep at night...Comment
-
What Bunk said, flat rate for every individual would be better, somewhere in the region of 10-15% for anyone earning over X (X being a bit higher than national average), zero for anyone below X
Corp rate should be the same
You might think that would lower tax revenue but so many would stop loopholeing or offshoring overall tax revenue would probably go upComment
-
Better still, don't tax income, tax expenditure...Originally posted by Not So Wise View PostWhat Bunk said, flat rate for every individual would be better, somewhere in the region of 10-15% for anyone earning over X (X being a bit higher than national average), zero for anyone below X
Corp rate should be the same
You might think that would lower tax revenue but so many would stop loopholeing or offshoring overall tax revenue would probably go upComment
-
A lot less government expenditure => a lot less need for tax (and for many of the poorest, none at all).How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - AesopComment
-
That's what VAT is (and the old Sales Tax).Originally posted by Churchill View PostBetter still, don't tax income, tax expenditure...
In NZ and Oz it's called GST, Goods and Services Tax because it's a tax on goods and services. Not too sure why it's called Value Added Tax here, where's the added value (as opposed to the added cost to the consumer)?Comment
-
Because if you don't add value, you don't have to charge it. Solicitors who pay fees for you don't add their own VAT on top.Originally posted by meridian View PostThat's what VAT is (and the old Sales Tax).
In NZ and Oz it's called GST, Goods and Services Tax because it's a tax on goods and services. Not too sure why it's called Value Added Tax here, where's the added value (as opposed to the added cost to the consumer)?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Today 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Yesterday 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44

Comment