• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Bye Bye Gordon!!!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    The YouTube comments have rather a different bias:

    Adam Boulton is so unprofessional it makes me sick the bias shown towards the Conservatives through the Sky News Election coverage. Tory Scumbag Adam Boulton, Murdoch's Puppet
    When will theTories realise that if thay had WON the election,as they keep telling us they have, NONE of this would be happening--at least they could admit that two thirds of the electorate voted against a Tory goverment--many of us have waited 20 years for this chance for a progressive centre left alliance.And who gives a **** about the markets!?--since when have they been a reflection of the British peoples real compassionate spirit
    Adam Boulton has always been a Tory, now he has shown it to everyone
    The right wing media are crumbling, Nick Robinson on the BBC had a similar moment. Go Campbell, you are just orchestrating what the 15 million people who voted against this right wing drivel are thinking.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #22
      Full 5 minute version - YouTube - Campbell v Boulton arguing live on Sky News. Watch to the end!

      (Nice forum touch, it automatically put the description to the link just from the URL. NICE!)
      If you have to add a , it isn't funny. HTH. LOL.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by shoes View Post
        What he actually said was that he intends to limp on as PM for a further 4 months before resigning as labour leader, in the meantime the pound and the stock market crash and burn.
        No, he didn't.

        He said that he would stand down as Labour leader when a leadership election can be arranged, which is incredibly bad advice from a party political point of view. Every time a party elects a new leader in the immediate aftermath of an election defeat, they lose (at least that is the case for every post war election). If the Tories had done that after the last defeat, David Davies would be leader, rather than Cameron, so this situation probably wouldn't be happening now.

        If there is a Labour coalition, then he will remain as PM until the party leadership election. After that, either the new leader or an alternative would become PM, depending on whether the new Labour leader is acceptable to the coalition.

        But, there would need to be a Labour coalition first, which is a long way off.
        If you have to add a , it isn't funny. HTH. LOL.

        Comment

        Working...
        X