I think concensus is that Medellin is city in Columbia.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Madeline McCann...
Collapse
X
-
-
The kidnap/murder capital of the world, isn't it?Originally posted by Swati View PostI think concensus is that Medellin is city in Columbia.Comment
-
At what level does a child become unsupervised? Out of the room, just out of the house, at the bottom of the garden, in the bar next to the bottom of the garden?Originally posted by Churchill View PostIf the McCanns hadn't left their children unsupervised the kid wouldn't have dissapeared. Therefore they(the McCanns) are responsible.
With your logic could say that every child that gets abducted was unsupervised becasue there was not a parent there at the time directly looking at the child to notice and to stop the abduction. Is that the case? Every child abduction can be blamed on the parents?Comment
-
You'd risk losing your child just so that you could go for a beer and Paella?Originally posted by minestrone View PostAt what level does a child become unsupervised? Out of the room, just out of the house, at the bottom of the garden, in the bar next to the bottom of the garden?
With your logic could say that every child that gets abducted was unsupervised becasue there was not a parent there at the time directly looking at the child to notice and to stop the abduction. Is that the case? Every child abduction can be blamed on the parents?
Your decision, your risk, ultimately your responsibility.
Btw, I prefer your posts after you've got pissed at the pub.Comment
-
Well, if you believe the British police the family was being stalked for several days leadin up to the abduction. If that was the case then the child would have eventually been taken.Originally posted by Churchill View PostYou'd risk losing your child just so that you could go for a beer and Paella?
Your decision, your risk, ultimately your responsibility.
Btw, I prefer your posts after you've got pissed at the pub.Comment
-
To take it to the extreme, yes. But, I would say it's all about balancing risk.Originally posted by minestrone View Post. Is that the case? Every child abduction can be blamed on the parents?
A child abducted from you back garden (assuming you don't live on a 50hectare country estate) could probably have been said to have been supervised.
If you are in a bar and checking on your kid ever 20 mins or so then you are not supervising the child - you are giving a potential abductor notice that the next time you leave the building he's got 20 minutes to get away with your kid."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostBtw, I prefer your posts after you've got pissed at the pub.
Cheers, i'm going for a pint now actually.Comment
-
Seems like a reasonable list of questions some of which one might refuse to answer, however refusing them all is suspicious at the very least.Comment
-
Agreed but if the people asking the questions have you fingered for the crime already you could answer 39 correctly, mess up the 40th and they would have you stripped naked and fumbling for soap in a foreign jail faster than you can blink.Originally posted by AtW View PostSeems like a reasonable list of questions some of which one might refuse to answer, however refusing them all is suspicious at the very least.
I would hazard a guess but I think keeping quiet in the face of accusing questions is only fair in the circumstances.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Bollocks, they're guilty as sin. I just can't prove it - but then again I haven't tried.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAgreed but if the people asking the questions have you fingered for the crime already you could answer 39 correctly, mess up the 40th and they would have you stripped naked and fumbling for soap in a foreign jail faster than you can blink.
I would hazard a guess but I think keeping quiet in the face of accusing questions is only fair in the circumstances.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLS) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? Yesterday 04:45
- Contractors, are you making any of the five big limited company bank account mistakes of 2026? May 28 05:51
- ‘Welcome’ increase in HMRC mileage rates for contractors using their own cars for work May 27 05:18
- King’s Speech 2026 including a welcome Late Payments Bill still leaves contractors short May 26 04:42
- Getting a mortgage when you're a contractor. The system wasn't built for you. Is that finally changing? May 22 06:11
- How deepfake AI contractors threaten umbrella company supply chains under JSL May 20 06:31
- Mileage rates review: Will the first AMAP rethink in 15 years benefit contractors? May 19 05:57
- What is a Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE), and are FDE jobs for IT contractors ripe? May 18 04:43
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25

Comment