Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Braindead idiots
Collapse
X
-
-
I interpreted it this way; he raises the issue because he can’t remove the last cost but needs to be able to do so. I think you’re interpreting that he doesn’t want to be able to remove the last cost. One of us may be less wrong than the other. Maybe SY01 will enlighten us.Originally posted by SuperZ View PostAm I being as braindead as the devs?
There seems to be a conflict between the following in your text:
'Cannot remove the last remaining cost. No Tick.'
'BI : "There is no such requirement to remove ALL costs"'
Did you not mean "Can remove the last remaining cost. No Tick" ?
You have to be acurate and precise for the devs
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
The client probably sees that as a case of:
- offshore developers delivered on time and cost.
- onshore manager failed to spec correctly.
A good case for offshoring!Comment
-
Does a project also have revenues? If so, do the same tests on those. If you can remove the last revenue, but not the last cost, then you could try setting up a revenue (without setting up a cost) then removing the project altogether; this could really fook up the books.Originally posted by expat View PostThe client probably sees that as a case of:
- offshore developers delivered on time and cost.
- onshore manager failed to spec correctly.
A good case for offshoring!And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Pay peanuts, get monkeys.
Not sure who is the monkey in this scenario
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
MichOriginally posted by Moscow Mule View PostPay peanuts, get monkeys.
Not sure who is the monkey in this scenario

Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
A banana cream sundae goes to . . . .Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI interpreted it this way; he raises the issue because he can’t remove the last cost but needs to be able to do so. I think you’re interpreting that he doesn’t want to be able to remove the last cost. One of us may be less wrong than the other. Maybe SY01 will enlighten us.
MichKnock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
Nope, that all works. You cannot close a project with outstanding cost and revenue.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostDoes a project also have revenues? If so, do the same tests on those. If you can remove the last revenue, but not the last cost, then you could try setting up a revenue (without setting up a cost) then removing the project altogether; this could really fook up the books.Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
How did you misunderstand? You're not off shore are youOriginally posted by SuperZ View PostAm I being as braindead as the devs?
There seems to be a conflict between the following in your text:
'Cannot remove the last remaining cost. No Tick.'
'BI : "There is no such requirement to remove ALL costs"'
Did you not mean "Can remove the last remaining cost. No Tick" ?
You have to be acurate and precise for the devs
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
So you didn’t want to be able to remove all costs?Originally posted by suityou01 View PostMich
So the SW is built to spec, Shirley?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment