• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Braindead idiots

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Braindead idiots"

Collapse

  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by Scrag Meister View Post
    Its just all a pretty astute and profitable business model.
    FTFY

    We might not like it - because we know whats going to happen....... but the bean counters and other numpties (still) fall for "much cheapness plenty quickness" despite so many experiences of it costing more and taking longer.......

    Leave a comment:


  • Scrag Meister
    replied
    I managed an off-shore not out-sourced dev team for 2.5 years, and personally found them to be totally lacking in any sort of innovative or pre-emptive thought.

    Spec and functional detail coming out of their ears and they just can't think outside the box.

    Any minor issues came back to the UK for further changes and more sign-off.

    Give them some ability to fix a minor issue, correct a small omission from the spec and they would have been more useful, even if they would accept verbal clearance to do it.

    Its just all ass covering and ducking any responsibility whatsoever.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Mich
    So you didn’t want to be able to remove all costs?

    So the SW is built to spec, Shirley?

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by SuperZ View Post
    Am I being as braindead as the devs?

    There seems to be a conflict between the following in your text:

    'Cannot remove the last remaining cost. No Tick.'

    'BI : "There is no such requirement to remove ALL costs"'

    Did you not mean "Can remove the last remaining cost. No Tick" ?

    You have to be acurate and precise for the devs
    How did you misunderstand? You're not off shore are you

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Does a project also have revenues? If so, do the same tests on those. If you can remove the last revenue, but not the last cost, then you could try setting up a revenue (without setting up a cost) then removing the project altogether; this could really fook up the books.
    Nope, that all works. You cannot close a project with outstanding cost and revenue.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I interpreted it this way; he raises the issue because he can’t remove the last cost but needs to be able to do so. I think you’re interpreting that he doesn’t want to be able to remove the last cost. One of us may be less wrong than the other. Maybe SY01 will enlighten us.
    A banana cream sundae goes to . . . .

    Mich

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Pay peanuts, get monkeys.

    Not sure who is the monkey in this scenario
    Mich

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Pay peanuts, get monkeys.

    Not sure who is the monkey in this scenario

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    The client probably sees that as a case of:
    - offshore developers delivered on time and cost.
    - onshore manager failed to spec correctly.

    A good case for offshoring!
    Does a project also have revenues? If so, do the same tests on those. If you can remove the last revenue, but not the last cost, then you could try setting up a revenue (without setting up a cost) then removing the project altogether; this could really fook up the books.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    The client probably sees that as a case of:
    - offshore developers delivered on time and cost.
    - onshore manager failed to spec correctly.

    A good case for offshoring!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by SuperZ View Post
    Am I being as braindead as the devs?

    There seems to be a conflict between the following in your text:

    'Cannot remove the last remaining cost. No Tick.'

    'BI : "There is no such requirement to remove ALL costs"'

    Did you not mean "Can remove the last remaining cost. No Tick" ?

    You have to be acurate and precise for the devs
    I interpreted it this way; he raises the issue because he can’t remove the last cost but needs to be able to do so. I think you’re interpreting that he doesn’t want to be able to remove the last cost. One of us may be less wrong than the other. Maybe SY01 will enlighten us.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Can you remove a project with no costs attached?
    yes

    Leave a comment:


  • SuperZ
    replied
    Am I being as braindead as the devs?

    There seems to be a conflict between the following in your text:

    'Cannot remove the last remaining cost. No Tick.'

    'BI : "There is no such requirement to remove ALL costs"'

    Did you not mean "Can remove the last remaining cost. No Tick" ?

    You have to be acurate and precise for the devs

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    No. This was added as a constraint 3 releases ago.
    Can you remove a project with no costs attached?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    God knows what they think of you.

    <shakeyHead>I wish that bedwetter would go away, he has the brains like a ripe melon and the face of a baboon</shakeyHead>

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X