• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Bye Bye Gordon Countdown Thread

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I've been inclined to supporting the hairy arsed one's point of view that actually a minority labour govt and then a sterling crash and IMF rescue would finally force Britain to sort out the debt problem and drive it home to people that a Labour government is economic suicide.

    However, look what's happening in Greece. Public sector 'workers' are going on strike, raising red flags, rioting and generally trying to disrupt the whole country, because socialists are simply incapable of facing the simple truth that if you keep spending more money than you have and keep spending other people's money, someday you'll run out of other people's money and go bust. They still can't face facts. Greece is bust. Without the IMF that will mean no oil, no electricity, no food imports, no loans for businesses, no jobs and no salaries. Are British socalists any more realistic than their Greek comrades? I don't think so.
    Hang on - wasn't it the banks who pissed all of others cash away

    Comment


      Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
      Hang on - wasn't it the banks who pissed all of others cash away
      Yes, and governments who have never worked within the limits of the money they recieve in taxes. Take on debt and you make yourself a slave of the lender and open yourself up to the merry go round of debt trading that is the credit market. Do that on behalf of citizens and you are enslaving your citizens.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
        Have the markets indicated that they are expecting a turbulent day by planning to open extra early or anything?
        It seems so, at 1 am
        Oh, I’m sorry….I seem to be lost. I was looking for the sane side of town. I’d ask you for directions, but I have a feeling you’ve never been there and I’d be wasting my time.

        Comment


          Originally posted by SizeZero View Post
          Dirty Spekulants!

          Don't tell AtW, he'll have a thrombosis!

          Comment


            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            Yes, and governments who have never worked within the limits of the money they recieve in taxes. Take on debt and you make yourself a slave of the lender and open yourself up to the merry go round of debt trading that is the credit market. Do that on behalf of citizens and you are enslaving your citizens.
            So companies and individuals can borrow cash but never governments ?

            Comment


              Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
              So companies and individuals can borrow cash but never governments ?
              Yes. that's called free will. Governments don't just decide for their voters, who almost never represent a majority; they also represent those who can't vote, like children, residents of other nationalities etc. They also must provide a stable financial environment where individuals or businesses can take risks without the consequences of those risks destroying too many others.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Yes. that's called free will. Governments don't just decide for their voters, who almost never represent a majority; they also represent those who can't vote, like children, residents of other nationalities etc. They also must provide a stable financial environment where individuals or businesses can take risks without the consequences of those risks destroying too many others.
                So no borrowing ever if you are a government?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
                  So no borrowing ever if you are a government?
                  You've pushed me to refine my point; I don't necessarily mind bonds being raised for specific, costed capital investment like bridges, railways, tunnels and airports that have a solid economic value. I object however to governments spending more money day to day than they recieve day to day. Brown ran a deficit, not to expand the capital investments needed to keep a modern economy going, but to waste on useless databases, ethnic peace bicycle lane consultants and quangos. Now Britain is paying the price.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    You've pushed me to refine my point; I don't necessarily mind fixed term bonds being raised for specific, costed capital investment like bridges, railways, tunnels and airports that have a solid economic value. I object however to governments spending more money day to day than they recieve day to day; that includes payment of interest on those bonds. Brown ran a deficit, not to expand the capital investments needed to keep a modern economy going, but to waste on useless databases, ethnic peace bicycle lane consultants and quangos. Now Britain is paying the price. Actually, what I'm saying isn't really all that radical; it's part of Germany's constitution.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      You've pushed me to refine my point; I don't necessarily mind fixed term bonds being raised for specific, costed capital investment like bridges, railways, tunnels and airports that have a solid economic value. I object however to governments spending more money day to day than they recieve day to day; that includes payment of interest on those bonds. Brown ran a deficit, not to expand the capital investments needed to keep a modern economy going, but to waste on useless databases, ethnic peace bicycle lane consultants and quangos. Now Britain is paying the price. Actually, what I'm saying isn't really all that radical; it's part of Germany's constitution.
                      So was invading Poland, look what trouble that caused...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X