A bit harsh moving threads there RH

[fullyautomatix]

I am seeing a very differnt RealityHack tonight. Wonder who messed with his head. Was it a troll from MumsNet ?

[AtW]

I am seeing a very differnt RealityHack tonight.

Yes, maybe he should not have used the same password as on his luggage...

[Churchill]

Well, a different tone from the ones in the PMs but, as the bard said: 'as you like it'.

You don't frighten me you power mad little sh!t!

[realityhack]

You don't frighten me you power mad little sh!t!

No?

[d000hg]

It's a little like reading Hitler's rise to power...

* gets the popular vote into power
* sneakily gets all other parties (mods) banned
* in charge

What's the CUK equivalent of invading Poland? And is administrator tied up in AndyW's basement, unable to intervene?

[fullyautomatix]

Is administrator hiding in AndyW's basement, fearing a ban from RH?

Ftfy

[ztt]

how odd you have a bizarrely slow to first post system

i am bored waiting to join you

[TheFaQQer]

Interesting PMs keeping me from logging off... care to air your views publicly?

I'll try, in my comeback post. I have deliberately refrained from bringing TF back because I did not want to potentially rehash arguments about the standard of moderation here when things seemed to had calmed down - I explained to admin last week that having made my peace with NAT, I did not want to risk stirring a hornets nest again. Since the issue has reared it's head again, it's fair game.

I have no idea what goes on behind the scenes here - I would wager that no-one apart from admin has the full view. I do have a fair idea of what goes on in front of the scenes, though, as it were.

Tonight's actions do not make pretty reading. They do not make CUK look good in anybody's eyes.

There are new rules coming - admin has assured us of that. In order for the new structure to work, people need to stick to the rules. The problem seems to be attempting to enforce the rules without us mere posters knowing what the rules are.

Admin posted in the holiday thread. If there was a problem with it, then he/she/it should have dealt with it. By not dealing with it, there is the assumption that it is acceptable. Likewise the word association thread - if there is a problem with it being in General (specifically), then it should / would have been dealt with a long time ago by the (then) moderators. I think this is a dangerous precedent to be setting, for whatever reason.

I look forward to seeing the place in the cold light of day.

[Xenophon]

I look forward to seeing the place in the cold light of day.

Me too.

[AtW]

I look forward to seeing the place in the cold light of day.

Not if your IP gets banned