Originally posted by Moscow Mule
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Falklands oil
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Jeebo72 View PostI've got 30K + invested (24K at risk as my own money). Why is that madness? I've returned more in profits and divvys each year than my pensions etc ...
If you've spent a big chunk your life savings on AIM shares (as some had professed to have doing), you're playing quite fast and loose IMO.
That said, it is an internet forum so they are probably all talking bollocks."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostI mean in one AIM listed share - it seemed to me that this was the only or one of a few things they had invested in.
.Comment
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostProspects not looking good: Falklands oil unviable - Desire Petroleum
If the oil is viable, the islands will either end up as part of Argentina or, more likely, part of USA once the dust settles.You know what you wanna do with that right, you wanna put a bangin' donk on it!Put a donk on it!Comment
-
Originally posted by Nicely Nicely View PostGood. Let's hope the Falklanders get left alone.
If the oil is viable, the islands will either end up as part of Argentina or, more likely, part of USA once the dust settles.
...After reading this short statement of facts, one may pause to consider what nation is at this moment the legitimate owner of the Falklands. Do the discovery, prior occupation, and settlement of new and uninhabited countries give a right to possession? If so, Great Britain is the legal owner of those islands. Davis first discovered them; Hawkins first named them; Strong first landed on them; and (excepting the French), Byron first took formal possession of them; and (again excepting the French), Macbride first colonized them. Respecting the French claim, depending only upon first settlement, not discovering, naming, or landing; whatever validity any one may be disposed to allow it, that value must be destroyed, when it is remembered that Spain asserted her superior claim, and that France actually admitted it, resigning for ever her pretensions to those islands. Whatever France might have been induced to do for political reasons, of which the most apparent now is the continuance of the trade she then carried on with Chile and Peru, England never admitted that the Spanish claim was valid: and France having withdrawn, the question is solely between Spain and Great Britain. Spaniards neither discovered, landed upon, nor settled in the Falklands before Englishmen; and their only claim rests uponthe unstable foundation of a papal bull, by virtue of which Spain might just as well claim Otaheite, the Sandwich Islands, or New Zealand.
As to the pretensions of Buenos Ayres, I shall only remark, that in a paper transmitted by her government to Mr. Baylies, chargé-d'affaires of the United States of North America, on the 14th August 1832, the advocate of her claims asserts, that "it is a political absurdity to pretend that a colony which emancipates itself, inherits the other territories which the metropolis may possess. If that singular doctrine were to be found in the code of nations, the Low Countries, for example, on their independence being acknowledged, in 1648, would have succeeded to Spain in her rights to America; and in the same manner, the United States would have appropriated to themselves the British possessions in the East-Indies. Inheritance, indeed! the United States did not inherit the rights of England in Newfoundland, notwithstanding its contiguity; and are they to inherit those which she may have to the Malvinas, at the southern extremity of the continent, and in the opposite hemisphere."...
http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/...text&pageseq=1 page 228 onwardsComment
-
Originally posted by Nicely Nicely View PostGood. Let's hope the Falklanders get left alone.
If the oil is viable, the islands will either end up as part of Argentina or, more likely, part of USA once the dust settles.Cats are evil.Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeebo72 View PostI've got 30K + invested (24K at risk as my own money). Why is that madness? I've returned more in profits and divvys each year than my pensions etc ...
It's not as if the official results have been announced and it is only the start of the campaign. These are going to be all over the place in the coming months.Comment
-
Anyone know why the shares has dropped again today?
Can't find any news on it??!!Comment
-
Originally posted by Money Money Money View PostAnyone know why the shares has dropped again today?
Can't find any news on it??!!
Anyway their next well is a few months away , so expect these to drift towards 20p.Comment
-
I'm half tempted to buy some Desire shares. Not because I think they'll find oil, but as a short term speculation based on a gamble that the price will rise again before the next drilling.
But I haven't bought shares for years and don't have a share trading account, so speculation of that sort will probably be a pain to set up, unless anyone knows of a hassle free way of buying shares?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment