Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Racially aggravated assault!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
that would be the Labour party.....Who has time? Who has time? But then if we do not ever take time, how can we ever have time? -
You are, of course, correct that it must have taken the copper ages to identify which of the millions of CCTV cameras were pointing at the one operational pump, not to mention the good fortune that it was designed to film motorists as they fill up and so fortunately was pointing in the right direction.Originally posted by meridian View PostI'm just surprised that everybody seems to accept that the proper response was for the police to waste time investigating, presumably going through cctv to find the car details, tracking down the owner, interviewing, filing police reports, etc.
As for identifying which one of the many motorists using the one operational pump at that time were gesticulating and flashing their lights at the stupid fat black woman - again another columbo job.
Regarding interviewing pissed up drivers who threaten members of the public for using the those little supermarket they have in garages, I see your point entirely. Fancy cautioning the guy that if he does it again the penalty will be worse. Just plain stupid IMHO. I mean these drunk drivers with aggressive tenancies never harm anyone, do they.
Copper must have been a commie I reckon.
Comment
-
Perhaps the woman concerned, rather than lowering herself to level of her assailant, had the presence of mind to take down the number plate and phone the police? Perhaps she found the experience of being verbally assaulted by a drunken racist idiot slightly terrifying?Originally posted by meridian View PostI'm just surprised that everybody seems to accept that the proper response was for the police to waste time investigating, presumably going through cctv to find the car details, tracking down the owner, interviewing, filing police reports, etc.
What a waste of everybody's time and resources. It was hardly an "assault" as the thread title indicates.
Where I come from the woman would have shouted back "f... off you honky wan..r" and that would have been the end of it.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Either that or she was used to it and therefore...preparedOriginally posted by doodab View PostPerhaps the woman concerned, rather than lowering herself to level of her assailant, had the presence of mind to take down the number plate and phone the police? Perhaps she found the experience of being verbally assaulted by a drunken racist idiot slightly terrifying?Who has time? Who has time? But then if we do not ever take time, how can we ever have time?Comment
-
I'm not questioning their investigation skills, rather the time they needed to spend on it - which includes the obligatory form filling, of course. Yes it might be easy work - but also disproportionately time-consuming.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostYou are, of course, correct that it must have taken the copper ages to identify which of the millions of CCTV cameras were pointing at the one operational pump, not to mention the good fortune that it was designed to film motorists as they fill up and so fortunately was pointing in the right direction.
As for identifying which one of the many motorists using the one operational pump at that time were gesticulating and flashing their lights at the stupid fat black woman - again another columbo job.
There was no mention in MF's opener that his mate was cautioned for either drink or aggression. The implication from the title is that he was cautioned for using racial language. Given that he was left waiting at the pump for 20 minutes at 2 in the morning it's hardly surprising he had "aggresive tendencies" (a term that seems to implicate him as being constantly close to boiling over. He was just "angry", and apparently justifiably so).Originally posted by Pondlife View PostRegarding interviewing pissed up drivers who threaten members of the public for using the those little supermarket they have in garages, I see your point entirely. Fancy cautioning the guy that if he does it again the penalty will be worse. Just plain stupid IMHO. I mean these drunk drivers with aggressive tenancies never harm anyone, do they.
Copper must have been a commie I reckon.

Comment
-
Perhaps if she hadn't been so ignorant and simply pulled in closer to the shop to allow other users to get near the pump she wouldn't have been met with verbal abuse.Originally posted by doodab View PostPerhaps the woman concerned, rather than lowering herself to level of her assailant, had the presence of mind to take down the number plate and phone the police? Perhaps she found the experience of being verbally assaulted by a drunken racist idiot slightly terrifying?Comment
-
Title: Racially aggravated assault!Originally posted by meridian View Post
There was no mention in MF's opener that his mate was cautioned for either drink or aggression. The implication from the title is that he was cautioned for using racial language. Given that he was left waiting at the pump for 20 minutes at 2 in the morning it's hardly surprising he had "aggresive tendencies" (a term that seems to implicate him as being constantly close to boiling over. He was just "angry", and apparently justifiably so).
That's not aggression is it?
And I think you're probably correct, being pissed up he was perfectly within his right to verbally harang some poor woman late at night for using the facilities available.Comment
-
Good lord. You're serious?Originally posted by meridian View PostPerhaps if she hadn't been so ignorant and simply pulled in closer to the shop to allow other users to get near the pump she wouldn't have been met with verbal abuse.Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
I know, it'sOriginally posted by MaryPoppins View PostGood lord. You're serious?
but also
in a sad way.
Comment
-
I dunno why I'm arguing about this (possibly BS) story. But still.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostI know, it's
but also
in a sad way.
What gets me is - she may possibly have been inconsiderate in her actions.
But verbally abusing someone in that manner, flashing lights etc etc is a very aggressive reaction (probably made worse by alcohol) which I guess must have left her very shaken.
It saddens me that anyone could think this reaction is justifiable really.Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment