• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Celebrities; send them to Room 101

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I don't have a clue who he is (except he looks like a footballist), but with a face like that he's obviously inbred, so he's IN.
    Rio Ferdinand...

    Just so you have a sense of what you've put in the room:

    * Thinks he's some sort of "dope gangsta"
    * Uses phrases like "dope gangsta"
    * Had a mini TV series where he 'pranked' other footballers, which made Beadles about look Oscar-worthy
    * "Allegedly" too stupid to remember to turn up to mandatory drugs test

    Oh, and this fantastic role model for children is now England captain due to John Terry's antic's with Wayne's missus (you couldn't make it up)...

    Which reminds me, another applicant:

    http://rheasport.files.wordpress.com...john-terry.jpg
    Proud owner of +5 Xeno Geek Points

    Comment


      #32
      All these blokes, as then you wouldn't have these "celebrities"
      Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Ravello View Post

        Which reminds me, another applicant:

        http://rheasport.files.wordpress.com...john-terry.jpg
        Ah, now then, this one has that 'both arms moving back and forth as he walks' syndrome; a sure sign of mental retardation. Not room 101 due to humane concerns; please find a nice mental home for this one. Sorry, must be selective you know!
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
          All these blokes, as then you wouldn't have these "celebrities"
          Nope, they're techies and scientists, we need more of them.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #35
            I am oblivious to so called celebrities.
            I don't watch shyte TV and I don't read crappy mags or 'newspapers'
            As a result when we do watch stuff on TV and see adverts for other programs we have no idea who these people are - its great

            But those 3 who did that show on 5, were appalling, I caught 3 mins of it once, I have no idea of names - sorry
            I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this

            Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
            CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
            CUK University Challenge Champions 2012

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Ravello View Post
              What about putting people who discriminate because of hair colour in with the said 'celebs'? A sort of punishment for being narrow minded and insensitive.
              Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                What about putting people who discriminate because of hair colour in with the said 'celebs'? A sort of punishment for being narrow minded and insensitive.
                Nothing to do with him being ginger; I decreed 'IN' because he's a twat.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment

                Working...
                X